Search for: "See v. See" Results 5501 - 5520 of 122,046
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2023, 12:52 am by Eleonora Rosati
The IPKat is pleased to host the following guest post by Katfriend Alessandro Cerri (Warner Bros Discovery) regarding the most recent instalment in the Lidl v Tesco IP dispute. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 11:46 pm by David Pocklington
In a guest post, HH Peter Collier KC looks critically at the controversy between the treatment of the institution of Holy Matrimony and the institution of civil marriage as distinct realities The note from the Legal Office Prayers of Love and Faith, GS 1339 summarises the legal background to the decision of the House of Bishops that it should commend Prayers of Love and Faith, a draft of which is contained in Annex B to GS 2289. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
And the privacy interests protected by that constitutional tort have been balanced against the public interest in freedom of expression at irish law in exactly the same way that they were balanced at all three levels in Bloomberg (here, the leading case is Cogley v RTÉ [2005] 4 IR 79, [2005] IEHC 180 (8 June 2005) (Clarke J); see also Herrity v Associated Newspapers [2009] 1 IR 316, [2008] IEHC 249 (18 July 2008)… [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 1:38 pm by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
(For details, see the 2016 Congressional Research Service report The Article V Convention to Propose Constitutional Amendments: Contemporary Issues for Congress.) [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 12:01 pm by admin
The large dataset used by Williams and colleagues, which they see as a plus, works against them by increasing the bias from the use of categorical variables for confounding variables.[12] The Williams study raises serious questions not only about the quality of medical journalism, but also about how an executive agency such as the Veterans Administration evaluates scientific evidence. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:10 am by Mills & Mills LLP
ONCA Reasserts the Purpose Of Anti-SLAPP Motions The Ontario Court of Appeal, in its recent decision in Park Lawn Corporation v. [read post]