Search for: "Sell v. Sell" Results 5501 - 5520 of 23,636
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2019, 1:30 am by Peter Mahler
I’ve previously featured on this blog several illustrative fixed price buy-sell lawsuits precipitated by stale or absent certificates of value, including Sullivan v Troser Management, Nimkoff v Central Park Plaza Associates, and DeMatteo v DeMatteo Salvage Co. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 4:25 am by SHG
This is a concrete rule that directly implicates our selling of our legal services. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 4:23 am
Following the recent CJEU decisions in Case C-617/15(Hummel v Nike, reported in various places including here) and joined Cases C-24/16 and C-25/16 (Nintendo v BigBen Interactive, reported on this very blawg), the English court’s decision in Poul Chang Metal Industry Company Ltd v Bailcast Ltd and Anor [2018] EWHC 3432 (Ch) has just become available. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 12:32 pm
  While the registration statement did not say that Parent could, at will, simply abandon the Company, “the offering documents did say that neither party was required to buy or sell any project, or to do so on any particular terms. [read post]
In particular, ESMA believes that there should be a means to ensure that the protocol and smart contracts underpinning crypto-assets and crypto-assets activities meet minimum reliability and safety requirements; some amendments to the pre- and post-trade transparency requirements applicable to venues trading crypto-assets are needed, as the current requirements are tailored to traditional financial instruments; and further analysis on the interaction between crypto-assets qualifying as financial… [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:39 pm
District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in Thompson v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:39 pm
District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in Thompson v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 10:32 am by David Super
  The Act's heavy reliance on Medicaid expansion also sought to save federal costs -- with disastrous results after NFIB v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 4:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
They listed the property for sale at least 10 months after finishing the basement and had no thoughts of selling the property at the time that they made those improvements (see Gabberty v Pisarz, 10 Misc 3d 1010, 1020-1021 [Sup Ct, Nassau County 2005]). [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 1:03 pm by Thomas DeLorenzo
The US Supreme Court ruled Tuesday in Henry Schein Inc. v. [read post]