Search for: "State Bank v. United States" Results 5501 - 5520 of 7,411
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2017, 4:35 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Richard Cordray was confirmed as the first Director of the CFPB by a 66-34 vote in the United States Senate on July 16, 2013, and took office on July 17, 2013.12. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 9:02 am by Chimene Keitner
Supreme Court heard arguments on Wednesday in the case of Samantar v. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 8:42 am by Amy Howe
The government asked the Supreme Court to weigh in on whether a final judgment in favor of the United States in a lawsuit brought under the FTCA, on the ground that a private individual could not be held liable in the same circumstances, bars a claim against a government employee based on Bivens v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by Noah Brown
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first oral contraceptive available in the United States without a prescription. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 11:50 am by Amy Howe
They granted a petition filed by Pankajkumar Patel, a citizen of India who came to the United States without authorization nearly 30 years ago. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 10:52 am by Philip Favro
  Court decisions from across the United States in 2011 have found the same connection; better data retention practices yield more successful document preservation results. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
On 1 March 2022 Nicklin J heard an application in the case of SMO v Tik Tok Inc. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 7:56 am by Alvaro Marañon, Stephanie Pell
In these talks, Biden made clear that certain critical infrastructure should be off limits to cyberattacks and further reiterated that the United States “would take action to hold cybercriminals accountable. [read post]
2 May 2021, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
United States USA today had a piece “Newsmax apologizes for airing false allegations against Dominion worker, who drops company from suit”. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]