Search for: "State v. Losee" Results 5501 - 5520 of 14,485
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  Furthermore, in the peculiar circumstances of the present case, Neurim was not trying to use a divisional to have “another bite of the cherry” after losing on the merits in the UK. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 3:11 pm by David E. Bernstein
Supreme Court precedent, mostly to my chagrin, seems rather clear that this is constitutional, and that the protected class in question need not be an individual or minority group--in FAIR v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
 The speakers will cover the current legal and legislative landscape, describe some different kinds of successful winning (and losing strategies), and talk about what you can do in your own state. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 4:00 pm
On the ninth day of jury selection in the case of United States of America v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 11:05 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
But in spite of the 11th Circuit's recent decision, the dozens of state legislative proposals mandating drug tests of individuals who apply for and receive various forms of public assistance do not appear to be losing ground. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 9:14 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
The Alberta Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Alberta Union of Provincial Employees v Alberta Health Services, 2020 ABCA 4 (CanLII) confirms this principle and states the limits of relying on the parties’ subjective intentions. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 11:03 am
Deportation: An alien who never acquired or who loses legal status inside the U.S. is subject to deportation by the INS. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 4:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Assoc. v Trump Empire State Partners, 245 AD2d 225, 227 [1st Dept 1997]). [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 9:20 am
Our prediction of winners: 1-1, against the spread 1:1ThursdayKentucky v. [read post]
31 Jul 2010, 9:58 am by Cynthia L. May
       Laws prohibiting discrimination trump patient preference regarding the race of health care providers, the Seventh Circuit recently ruled in Chaney v. [read post]