Search for: "State v. P. B." Results 5501 - 5520 of 6,786
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2014, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
Over the years there have been numerous lawsuits and investigations by various state and federal agencies relating to S&P’s ratings of mortgage-backed securities and collateralized debt obligations that contributed to the 2008 financial meltdown. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 4:37 pm by Bill Marler
Persons do not carry hepatitis A long-term as with hepatitis B and C. [read post]
23 May 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Famous examples are R v Director of Public Prosecutions, Ex p Kebilene [2000] 2 AC 326 , R (L) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2010] 1 AC 410 and Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] UKHL 30. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 5:14 am
(to be continued) - Vinod Kothari & Soma Bagaria [1] In case of Surat Peoples’ Co-Operative Bank v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 2:03 am
The first of these courts is famous for setting the pulse racing; in the latter court, the pulse is scarcely detectable.The duel in question was Case C-51/09 P Barbara Becker v Harman International Industries, Inc., Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, an appeal to the Fourth Chamber of the Court of Justice from the General Court.In November 2002 Barbara Becker -- former wife of well-known former tennis player Boris Becker -- applied to register as a Community trade… [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 9:26 am by Bexis
P. 23 to seek class action status in federal court:The question in dispute is whether [plaintiff's] suit may proceed as a class action. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 11:10 am
 CEQA Guidelines section 15164(b) states that an addendum to a ND is only appropriate when “minor technical changes or additions are necessary. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 5:15 am by Hutko
Although the lower Swedish courts accepted Bayern’s standing to sue, the Supreme Court (B 4367-97, 21 December 1998) seemed to have doubts about possibility to recognize the seizure under the Swedish copyright law. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 5:15 am by Hutko
Although the lower Swedish courts accepted Bayern’s standing to sue, the Supreme Court (B 4367-97, 21 December 1998) seemed to have doubts about possibility to recognize the seizure under the Swedish copyright law. [read post]