Search for: "State v. Stephens." Results 5501 - 5520 of 7,112
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Mr Justice Stephens was told a confidential resolution had been reached between the parties. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 1:28 pm by Florian Mueller
But none of that makes Aspen an exclusive and extremely narrow path to the conclusion Judge Koh reached in FTC v. [read post]
6 May 2021, 12:23 pm by Joshua Braver
§ 2383 provides: Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 9:05 am by Scott Bomboy
” Of course, that litigation process within the states may involve rulings from the United States Supreme Court, as in Bush v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 3:34 am
Study suggest they were. (271 Patent Blog) New test for evaluating patentability of algorithms: Ex parte Gutta (Found Persuasive) False patent marking roulette wheel (Patent Baristas) Selling goods in the US: the importance of correct patent marking (comparison of US and Australian laws) (Mallesons Stephen Jaques)   US Patents – Decisions District Court S D Georgia: Stay pending reexam granted prior to PTO’s grant of petition for reexam: E-Z-GO et al v Club Car… [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:45 pm
: District Court Delaware dismisses lawsuit by Pernod Ricard against Bacardi (IP tango)   US Trade Marks – Decisions CAFC affirms TTAB’s CRASH DUMMIES no abandonment decision: Mattel, Inc v The Crash Dummy Movie (TTABlog) TTAB precedential no 14: Noncommercial use defense to a dilution claim unavailable in a TTAB proceeding: American Express Marketing & Development Corp v Gilad Development Corporation (TTABlog) TTAB precedential no 13: Divided TTAB Panel… [read post]
28 May 2023, 12:15 am by Frank Cranmer
Humanism and “religious education” In R (Bowen) v Kent County Council [2023] EWHC 1261 (Admin), the Claimant, Stephen Bowen, is a humanist who sought to be appointed to join Group A of Kent County Council’s Standing Advisory Council for Religious Education as a full member: his predecessor as chair of Kent Humanists had had observer status. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 3:25 pm
A footnote at the end of Circuit Judge Stephen Reinhardt's opinion for the Court noted the maneuver on AEDPA's constitutionality, but said the panel was "now persuaded" that one of the Circuit's own precedents, Duhaime v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:10 am by New Books Script
JF 491 T54 2012 Constitutional referendums : the theory and practice of republican deliberation Stephen Tierney. [read post]