Search for: "State v. Word"
Results 5501 - 5520
of 40,650
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2016, 6:34 am
State v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 6:07 pm
Ashcroft v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 2:02 am
A short case comment on R (Miller & Anor) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union & Ors [2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin), which will likely be appealed to the Supreme Court. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 11:02 am
Clark v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 5:59 pm
A costs endorsement in the case of Persampieri v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 3:09 pm
(Digital Realty Trust v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 3:00 am
By choosing the word “should” over “can,” this topic remains a focal point of interest and debate, especially since the law remains undeveloped in numerous states. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 10:39 am
Gore "guideposts" (reprehensibility, ratio, and comparable penalties).First, the court observed that the defendant's conduct implicated only two of the five "reprehensibility factors" identified in State Farm v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 4:56 pm
In Louisiana v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 7:30 am
Practice Tip: The United States Supreme Court addressed the elements required for trade dress to be protected in Two Pesos, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 4:43 am
Last year I commented on Gilman v. [read post]
14 Jan 2017, 8:52 am
United States. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 10:43 am
In Geden Operations v Dry Bulk Handy Holding Inc (The “Bulk Uruguay”) [2014] EWCA 885, the Commercial Court, in rejecting an appeal under s.69 Arbitration Act 1996, considered the impact of words or conduct giving rise to uncertainty about future performance, the contingency of which rested upon the conduct of a third party, and whether this can amount to anticipatory breach of contract. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 8:40 am
The district court also rejected Hobbs' "unique combination" argument because it interpreted the law, as stated in Peters v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 8:59 am
751 (1998), and United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 10:00 pm
Where demand or refusal was relied upon, it had to be clear or unequivocal, but not necessarily in express words. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 6:53 am
This has been seen different in the United States, as under the Feist Publications v Rural Telephone Service decision (more on which can be found here) effort alone won't give a work protectability under copyright. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 2:23 pm
In the service's results the opening words of the article, the key word and a few surrounding words and a hyperlink are provided for the client, allowing them to find the article containing their desired content more easily. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 3:29 am
By following this approach, the United States would align itself to case law in Canada (Balev case – Canadian Supreme Court, see our previous post here), the European Union (Mercredi v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 6:00 am
Georgia State University, which is currently on appeal at the 11th Circuit.) [read post]
