Search for: "US v. Givens"
Results 5501 - 5520
of 51,324
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2022, 1:01 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:10 pm
[See United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:10 pm
[See United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm
" In light of the foregoing, and given that no contrary medical opinions were presented, the Board's factual determination that claimant suffered from an occupational disease resulting from repetitive stress is supported by substantial evidence and will not be disturbed (see Matter of Garcia v MCI Interiors, Inc., 158 AD3d 907, 908 [2018]; Matter of Curtis v Xerox, 66 AD3d 1106, 1108 [2009]). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm
" In light of the foregoing, and given that no contrary medical opinions were presented, the Board's factual determination that claimant suffered from an occupational disease resulting from repetitive stress is supported by substantial evidence and will not be disturbed (see Matter of Garcia v MCI Interiors, Inc., 158 AD3d 907, 908 [2018]; Matter of Curtis v Xerox, 66 AD3d 1106, 1108 [2009]). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:02 pm
"[F]ederal constitutional claims may not be asserted in the Court of Claims, given that the statutory basis for such claims, 42 USC § 1983, authorizes claims only against a 'person' and defendant is not a person within the meaning of this statute" (Oppenheimer v State of New York, 152 AD3d 1006, 1008 [2017]; accord Moreland v State of New York, 200 AD3d 1362, 1365 [2021], lv denied 38 NY3d 906 [2022]; see Will v Michigan Dept. of State… [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:02 pm
"[F]ederal constitutional claims may not be asserted in the Court of Claims, given that the statutory basis for such claims, 42 USC § 1983, authorizes claims only against a 'person' and defendant is not a person within the meaning of this statute" (Oppenheimer v State of New York, 152 AD3d 1006, 1008 [2017]; accord Moreland v State of New York, 200 AD3d 1362, 1365 [2021], lv denied 38 NY3d 906 [2022]; see Will v Michigan Dept. of State… [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 1:20 pm
Today, we remember that trust is precious and should not be given lightly. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 12:32 pm
"] The University of California President thinks so: University of California President Michael V. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 12:30 pm
This week, the Supreme Court handed parents and students a major victory in Carson v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 12:18 pm
Bauer Seyfarth Synopsis: In Easom v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 11:57 am
From Manno v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
The Court overrules not only Roe v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 am
Rogers v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 8:01 am
Given the growing confusion in the lower courts, a Supreme Court case on the issue seems increasingly inevitable. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 7:34 am
See Webster v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:54 am
It is hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:20 am
ShareThe Supreme Court in Shoop v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 5:54 am
Tekoh sued the Sheriff under 1983 and won, but the Court vacated the judgment on the ground that the Court had given the wrong jury instructions. [read post]