Search for: "Voter v. Voter" Results 5501 - 5520 of 6,769
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2010, 8:30 am by Harry Styron
Whatever the height of Collins’s perch, her vision is not acute enough to truly understand how Missouri voters make their decisions. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 3:32 am by SHG
Chief Judge Vaughn Walker's decision in Perry v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 12:01 am by Transplanted Lawyer
There are two meaty things to note about the opinion in Perry v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 11:46 pm by Jeff Gamso
 That voters approved Proposition 8 denying same-sex couples the right to marry, Judge Walker said, is irrelevant sincefundamental rights may not be submitted to [a] vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections.That's a quote from the Supreme Court's 1943 decision in West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 3:18 pm
An e-mail just received from my Law Librarian, Erin Murphy, identifies the pith of the trial court judgment against Proposition 8, the voter initiative that made a prohibition on same-sex marriage part of California's Constitution. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 3:09 pm by Gideon
” West Virginia State Board of Education v Barnette, 319 US 624, 638 (1943) But really, Judge Walker didn’t need to write that long decision. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 6:36 am by Gritsforbreakfast
OTOH, I suspect voter turnout might be lower than average among those on probation or parole. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 11:09 am by David Doniger
The goal of the funding riders is to overrule the Supreme Court’s landmark 2007 decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 7:53 am by Jeff Gamso
   Here's the question to ask before putting Mumia (or anyone else) front and center: will he gain us more support from those we need - judges, legislators, governors, voters - than he will [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 5:21 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
"JWT creates iPad app for Schick" http://j.mp/9cNurQ mumbrella on life "After Harold" http://j.mp/creUZt /cc @suziblack does anyone know what happened in the rowe v electoral commissioner directions hearing in the high court this morning? [read post]