Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 5501 - 5520
of 6,888
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2011, 3:45 am
This likely stems from Dan's faith in judges' desire to protect and defend the Constitution, in contrast to my belief, for example, that judges want to make sure the bad guy goes to prison.This last section of the book might have offered a very provocative and interesting view of what the future might look like if we were able to move beyond failed Fourth Amendment jurisprudence, riddled with exceptions and misdirected in focus. [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 9:13 am
Those who favor whitewashing history—favor suppressing the grievances and rights of Americans unlike themselves—favor suppressing the franchise of citizens who don't look like them—have shown they'll lie … to protect their privilege and power …. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 10:02 am
In addition to the factual novelty of the case (the registrar as an ACPA defendant and the 1129 cyberpiracy claim), some other interesting angles to this case: * I've repeatedly argued that lawsuits over domain names don't make economic sense, and we get more evidence of that here. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 12:14 pm
I've defended this board centric model of corporate governance countless times, so I won't rehash the larger debate here. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 11:04 am
We do no more today than confirm its continuing efficacy.Pretty affecting, isn't it? [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 7:07 pm
You don't have any other information other than your knowledge of human beings. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 5:26 am
As Douglass's reference to the "spirit" of the Constitution indicates, he was more nearly a purposivist in legal interpretation. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 1:19 am
Even a cautious person can easily miss a single, but dangerous, step; you just don't expect a drop from one room to another, and you instinctively rely on visual clues to warn you of dangerous steps. [read post]
7 May 2012, 11:20 am
The Court could say (and has said) that some offenses don't qualify. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 4:37 am
I guess I agree with that; I don't really know why I wouldn't. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 4:11 am
Here's a notable highlight from Terrence Stutz's Morning News story:David Hodges, who served as a state district judge based in McLennan County, told the panel that the Texas Driver Responsibility Program has had a "devastating" effect on the Texas court system, and judges across the state are reporting at least two years of pending driving-while-intoxicated cases as more defendants seek trials. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 2:03 pm
"It's a good thing you don't get punished for expressing yourself, but a bad thing you get punished for things that don't exist. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 12:30 pm
We want you to make clear that the part that could help out future New York criminal defendants was dictum. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 2:02 pm
Current TM approaches don’t provide sufficient guidance. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 3:00 am
I don’t propose to answer those questions, other than to point out that in a sense what goes around comes around—remember that Harley-Davidson had successfully, and correctly in my view, argued that the US court had jurisdiction to enter preliminary injunctive relief even before service of process on a foreign defendant). [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 11:27 am
I don't think we should eliminate universal jurisdiction. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 9:37 am
The court previously said nein, and the court again (different judge) definitively closes the door on this argument. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 4:07 am
I don't blame any lawyer for following this path. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 2:01 pm
They further don't tell you that you have four (4) years from the date of the accident to bring a claim for your injury. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 10:39 am
They further don't tell you that you have four (4) years from the date of the accident to bring a claim for your injury. [read post]
