Search for: "Weeks v. United States" Results 5501 - 5520 of 19,155
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The report was published by Care Post-Roe, a project aimed at studying the impacts of narrowing abortion rights across the United States. [read post]
Jones in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, but this was later reversed after Roe v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 12:59 pm by Leslie Sammis
Any cases currently pending in County Criminal Division “V” will be transferred to Circuit Criminal Division “V. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 3:31 pm by Barry Barnett
That the victims suffered harm outside the United States may not matter under RICO. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 8:35 pm
  (Subscription required.)BackgroundFiled by Newman Ferrara back in May of 2016 in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, the lawsuit, entitled Lennen v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 5:55 am by Steve Kalar
It does to Judge Kleinfeld (left) in a new categorical analysis decision, United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 9:41 am by Ed Bates, University of Southampton
In his speech earlier this week the Attorney General announced that he would appear in person before the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights in two weeks’ time, when it hears Scoppola v Italy No2, a case concerning prisoner voting. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 8:12 am by Brian Zupruk
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit tackled self-execution of 1958 Convention Article 6—curtailing jurisdiction over foreign vessels in international waters—in United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 1969, 4:00 pm by JLiu
First, it creates an emergency exception allowing the government to continue targeting “roamers”—people lawfully targeted as non-United States persons located outside the United States, but who suddenly show up in the United States—for a brief period of time after they show up in the United States, so long as “a lapse in the targeting of such non-United States person poses a threat… [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 10:18 am
  Section 1981 provides that any “person within the jurisdiction of the United States” has the same right to “make and enforce” contracts, regardless of their skin color. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 1:41 pm by David Ettinger
”) Because referendum signatures have been submitted to California’s Secretary of State, the writ petition in Vandermost v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 12:39 pm by John Elwood
  (2)  Whether United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 2:47 pm by John Elwood
United States, 11-799; Vance v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 8:00 am by Trevor Cutaiar
Interestingly, the case was tried before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Atlantic Sounding Co. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 5:48 am
United States and Black v. [read post]