Search for: "Wells v. Justice Court" Results 5501 - 5520 of 29,128
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2008, 2:35 am
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in Fitzgerald v. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 4:53 pm
Mind you, I wouldn't be as emphatic as Justice McIntyre is, because I think that Justice Huffman (who wrote the majority opinion) makes a darn good case to the contrary. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:24 pm by Lyle Denniston
   The Court’s electronic docket noted on Wednesday that the California case, as well as a somewhat related Arizona case and one of the cases involving the federal Defense of Marriage Act, were set for that Conference. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 3:27 pm
The bill recommends providing $15 million annually to state courts to develop and implement court interpreter programs as well as share best practices between states. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 8:27 am by Richard Primus
An earlier post on this blog by Mark Tushnet explained that Justice Gorsuch’s dissent in Gundy v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 8:26 am by Michael K. Grife, Esq.
Stat. 766.118 lacks any rational relation to a state objective, and fails both the “smell test” (another quote from Justice Pariente in Estate of McCall) as well as the rational basis test. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 8:26 am by Michael K. Grife, Esq.
Stat. 766.118 lacks any rational relation to a state objective, and fails both the “smell test” (another quote from Justice Pariente in Estate of McCall) as well as the rational basis test. [read post]
22 May 2019, 7:47 am by Eric Goldman
The court also finds that the exercise of jurisdiction would not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 12:36 pm by Christine Hurt
Justice Sotomayor, dissenting, argues that the pre-trial sentiment in Houston against Enron, and Skilling, in particular, was as virulent as the types the Court has held warranted transfer: Rideau v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 6:58 am by Nabiha Syed
Today, the Court will hear oral arguments in Schwarzenegger v. [read post]