Search for: "v. "
Results 5501 - 5520
of 493,813
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2011, 12:42 pm
On April 20, 2011, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Sossamon v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 12:47 pm
Aristocrat v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 10:02 am
Drew v Whitbread plc [2010] EWCA Civ 53; [2010] WLR (D) 41 “A party was not precluded from raising a matter before a costs judge on an assessment of costs which it had not raised before the trial judge when he exercised his discretion as to costs. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 3:12 pm
On May 14, 2012, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Hall v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 2:37 am
Cooper v Attorney General [2010] EWCA Civ 464; [2010] WLR (D) 122 “The obligation of a member states to make good damage caused to individuals by infringements of Community law for which they were responsible also applied where the alleged infringement stemmed from a decision of a court adjudicating at last instance where the rule of Community law infringed was intended to confer rights on individuals, the breach was sufficiently serious and there was a direct causal link… [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 12:45 pm
Marvin v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 3:36 am
Borger v Tiroler Gebietskrankenkasse (Case C-516/09); [2011] WLR (D) 89 “The status of an ‘employed person’, within the meaning of article 1(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71, as amended , applied to a person during a six-month period of extended unpaid leave following the birth of a child, provided that, during that period, that person was covered, even if only in respect of a single risk, on a compulsory or optional basis, by a general or special social security… [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 1:54 am
When accused tries to import victim’s sexual history DS v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 3:20 am
Regina v W and others [2010] EWCA Crim 927; [2010] WLR (D) 125 “Where a person was accused of permitting the deposit, disposing or keeping of controlled waste, contrary to s 33 of the Control of Pollution Act 1990, the question whether the material in question amounted to ‘waste’, and if so, ‘controlled waste’, was a question of fact for the jury, as was the question of whether material which was originally waste had been acceptably recovered or disposed of in… [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 9:03 am
On April 2, 2012 the Supreme Court announced its decision in Rehberg v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 2:16 pm
On February 21, 2012, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Howes v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 7:08 am
Gill v Woodall and others [2010] EWCA Civ 1430; [2011] WLR (D) 328 “To determine whether a testatrix knew and approved the contents of her will the proper approach was to consider the factual and expert evidence and to ask whether the testatrix appreciated what was in the will when she signed it. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 1:00 pm
On June 28, 2012 the Supreme Court announced its decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 3:05 am
Regina v T (N) [2010] EWCA Crim 711; [2010] WLR (D) 93 ”The prosecution were not entitled to apply for leave to appeal against a terminating ruling made by a judge in a Crown Court on a trial on indictment, unless it had complied with the mandatory requirements of s 58(4) and (8) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003, following the making of the ruling, of informing the court that it intended to appeal or requesting an adjournment to consider such an appeal and, before or at that… [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 10:08 am
On December 5, 2011, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Messerschmidt v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 7:06 pm
Supreme Court granted certiorari in United States v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 1:52 am
Curistan v Times Newspapers Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 432; [2008] WLR (D) 135 “The qualified privilege which attached to a “fair and accurate” report of parliamentary proceedings was not necessarily lost because of the addition of extraneous non-privileged material in the same article. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 3:14 am
Hughes v Borodex Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 425; [2010] WLR (D) 106 “A tenant who had made extensive improvements at her own expense to the flat which she held on a long residential tenancy was not entitled to have those improvements disregarded by a Rent Assessment Committee fixing the rent of the new assured periodic tenancy of the same premises. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 10:20 am
On January 9, 2012, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Blumen v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Wang v. [read post]
