Search for: "Application of Smith" Results 5521 - 5540 of 7,622
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
(IP Dragon) Denmark Denmark's new transfer pricing IP valuation guideline (IP finance) Europe ECJ: COLOR EDITION - the A-G delivers his opinion on the application by Lâncome: Lancôme v OHIM and CMS Hasche Sigle (Class 46) ECJ: Diesel ruling affirms that exhausting still trumps trademarks, but consent must be unequivocal: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV v Diesel SpA (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI: KINDER vs TIMI KINDERJOGHURT: No res… [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 7:46 am by INFORRM
Application of section 40 of FOIA to names of civil servants by and to whom submissions to ministers are sent. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 5:00 pm
Smith dismissed the application based on a missed limitation period on the basis that it had not started to run until the quantum of remediation costs was known in 2006. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 8:51 am by Michelle Yeary
Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc., 1999 WL 811334, at *24 (Tex. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 5:18 am by Russ Bensing
Smith) indicates that, at least in the 8th, attempts to prosecute Megan’s Law offenders under the provisions of the AWA are going to be in for rough going. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 6:09 pm by INFORRM
The application was declared inadmissible on 7 Sep 2010 by Judge Giovanni Bonello, the Court’s Maltese judge, under the single judge procedure introduced in Protocol 14 to the ECHR. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:04 pm by Max Kennerly, Esq.
… The application of a discount to a minority shareholder is contrary to the requirement that the company be viewed as a ‘going concern. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Smith and Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 2:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Any application to unseal the Agreement, and subsequently to compel its disclosure upon a showing of relevance under the applicable law, is appropriately made by the Chapmans in Superior Court in California. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 11:21 pm by MacIsaac
 2008 BCSC 1315. [22] The fact that a plaintiff continues to suffer damages in British Columbia is insufficient to establish a real and substantial connection on its own: Roed, supra, at para. 43… [26] Since the hearing of this application, our Court of Appeal has rejected the approach set out in Muscutt: see Stanway, supra, paras. 71 to 73. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 10:50 am
I’ve recently been blogging about my new article, The Inherent-Powers Corollary: Judicial Non-Delegation and Federal Common Law, which I’ve posted to SSRN. [read post]