Search for: "DOE v. UNITED STATES"
Results 5521 - 5540
of 44,317
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2012, 9:03 pm
Last week, the Hawaii Supreme Court issued an opinion in Hawaii State Teachers Association and United Public Workers, AFCME, Local 646, AFL-CIO v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 12:15 pm
In Connolly v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 9:25 pm
And so my question is—I just want to find out: Does the United States think that I can be fair and impartial? [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 5:01 am
" What, then, was not in the United States? [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 5:01 am
" What, then, was not in the United States? [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 9:06 am
Background In United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 8:10 am
Background In United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 5:20 am
Background In United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 4:52 am
Background In United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 5:00 am
In doing so, the Court had this to say about Concepcion: We invited the parties to provide their comments on the recent United States Supreme Court case, AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 1:24 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 4:49 pm
To read the full text of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Christopher v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 1:09 pm
§ 1536(a)(2), does not apply to the United States Bureau of Reclamation's (Bureau) renewals of the Sacramento River Settlement ("SRS") contracts. [read post]
10 May 2007, 2:29 pm
In the Federal Tort Claims Act, Congress waived the sovereign immunity of the United States (and thus created the possibility of damages) for the "negligent or wrongful act or omission of any employee of the Government while acting within the scope of his office or employment, under circumstances where the United States, if a private person, would be liable to the claimant in accordance with the law of the place where the act or omission occurred. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 11:35 am
"[Plaintiff] argues that a forward-looking money damages award would be insufficient because [defendant] is a foreign company with no assets within the United States. . . . [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
Yet merchants in the United States frequently provide by contract that consumers have the right to return goods. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 6:38 pm
United States (Bruce R. [read post]
5 Jul 2014, 8:11 pm
Civil Action No. 13-1887 (ES), United States District Court, D. [read post]
5 Jul 2014, 8:11 pm
Civil Action No. 13-1887 (ES), United States District Court, D. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 12:18 pm
In United States v. [read post]