Search for: "DOES, 1-20"
Results 5521 - 5540
of 27,661
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2017, 3:38 am
, Says TTABPrecedential No. 13: TTAB Dismisses 2(d) Claim but Finds MINIMELTS Merely Descriptive of PharmaceuticalsPrecedential No. 12: TTAB Affirms 2(e)(1) and 2(d) Refusals of HOUSEBOAT BLOB for Inflatable MattressesPrecedential No. 5: Fame of Movie "JAWS" Supports 2(d) Refusal of Cooking Show MarksPrecedential No. 3: Despite Consent Agreement, TTAB Finds TIME TRAVELER BLONDE Confusable With TIME TRAVELER for BeerSection 2(e)(1) - Mere Descriptiveness Precedential No.… [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 10:02 am
Part 1 (Property Casualty 360 4/1/19)…. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 3:35 pm
The court does agree with the defendant, however, that the sentence imposed was illegal. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 3:46 am
Test Your TTAB Judge-Ability: Which One of These Five Section 2(e)(1) Mere Descriptiveness Refusals Was Reversed? [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 5:38 am
It stated that the report “does not categorically rule out the existence of marks similar or identical to the contested mark” and that “the applicant’s alleged diligence cannot be proven” (paragraph 60). [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 1:15 pm
In an upcoming blog post, we will review frequently asked questions from Massachusetts employers as they prepare for January 1, 2021. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 9:11 pm
This Sunday, January 20, 2013 will be the seventh time. [read post]
26 Nov 2016, 1:32 pm
Dunlap, No. 16-16271 (Oct. 20, 2016) (Ord.) [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 7:49 am
Chiefs are getting 3 at home. 3 points for Josh Allen and the Bills is a second and 20 at their own five with forty seconds left. [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 4:18 am
That conclusion, likely not too shocking to anyone, is the following: less conventional marks remain (very) difficult to register.The rise of the substantial value groundOne issue is the growing relevance of the absolute ground for refusal/invalidity concerning signs that consist exclusively of a shape or another characteristic that gives substantial value to the goods (Article 7(1)(e)(iii) EUTMR/4(1)(e)(iii) EUTMD).Such a ground, considered quite niche if not altogether… [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 12:55 pm
The earlier marks had been registered for over 20 years and it was not for the Board of Appeal to rule on the Cypriot public's perception in the absence of any evidence to the contrary. [read post]
19 May 2013, 5:01 pm
This obligation that is derived from the fundamental procedural principle of the right to be heard has also found an expression in A 112a(2)(d) in connection with R 104(a), in the context of substantial procedural violations.[2.2] In its response dated August 20, 2009, the [applicant] had filed a request for a “hearing” (“Anhörung”) in case the ED intended to refuse the present application […]. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 4:15 am
The SPC therefore rejected the retrial petition filed by Wuhan Zhongjun.CommentIn recent years, the volume of trade mark applications in China has continued to grow (by 20%-30% each year). [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 3:43 pm
NRDC, 555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008). [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 5:37 am
Where does the honesty come into play? [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 4:18 pm
Specifically, the '281 patent recites: 1. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 9:02 am
On September 1, 2023, China’s National People’s Congress Standing Committee passed the Foreign State Immunity Law, to take effect on Jan. 1, 2024. [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:02 am
Federal law doesn’t regulate the mining of uranium, but it does regulate uranium processing and the handling of the tailings left over afterwards. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 6:04 am
Updated, 1 Sep | The high-profile criminal trial of a German popstar who caused her former partner to be infected with HIV has resulted in a 2-year suspended sentence. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:47 pm
Without some explanation as to what the declaration does or does not show, Appellants do not persuade us that the declaration demonstrates diligence over the period from December 20, 2001 through June 25, 2002. [read post]
