Search for: "Does, 1-20" Results 5521 - 5540 of 27,661
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2020, 11:02 pm by Kevin Sheerin
  The CSC does not argue this fact but states that the 35dB test “is not a “rule” but a “standard” or a “regulation”” which does not have to comply with Civil Service Law. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 9:14 pm by Stu Ellis
  Here is some help…   What does it look like? [read post]
27 May 2014, 11:21 am by Christina M. Kennedy
For example, it is perfectly reasonable for a server to cut lemons, portion desserts, and make coffee, so long as such time does not exceed the 20 percent threshold. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 5:01 am
There are two batches of changes summarised below, with the first, bigger, batch effective from 1 October 2016, and the second from 6 April 2017.Changes from 1 October 2016Introduction of a notification of intention to grant.The UK IPO will now be providing advance notice of grant to applicants. [read post]
21 May 2021, 11:00 am by Sophie Corke
While his public disdain for intellectual property rights “does not annul any validly acquired rights to copyright or trademarks”, such comments add light and shade to the bad faith finding. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 3:38 am
, Says TTABPrecedential No. 13: TTAB Dismisses 2(d) Claim but Finds MINIMELTS Merely Descriptive of PharmaceuticalsPrecedential No. 12: TTAB Affirms 2(e)(1) and 2(d) Refusals of HOUSEBOAT BLOB for Inflatable MattressesPrecedential No. 5: Fame of Movie "JAWS" Supports 2(d) Refusal of Cooking Show MarksPrecedential No. 3: Despite Consent Agreement, TTAB Finds TIME TRAVELER BLONDE Confusable With TIME TRAVELER for BeerSection 2(e)(1) - Mere Descriptiveness Precedential No.… [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 3:35 pm
The court does agree with the defendant, however, that the sentence imposed was illegal. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 3:46 am by John L. Welch
Test Your TTAB Judge-Ability: Which One of These Five Section 2(e)(1) Mere Descriptiveness Refusals Was Reversed? [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 5:38 am by Neil Wilkof
It stated that the report “does not categorically rule out the existence of marks similar or identical to the contested mark” and that “the applicant’s alleged diligence cannot be proven” (paragraph 60). [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 9:11 pm by CAPTAIN
  This Sunday, January 20, 2013 will be the seventh time. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 7:49 am
  Chiefs are getting 3 at home. 3 points for Josh Allen and the Bills is a second and 20 at their own five with forty seconds left. [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 4:18 am by Eleonora Rosati
That conclusion, likely not too shocking to anyone, is the following: less conventional marks remain (very) difficult to register.The rise of the substantial value groundOne issue is the growing relevance of the absolute ground for refusal/invalidity concerning signs that consist exclusively of a shape or another characteristic that gives substantial value to the goods (Article 7(1)(e)(iii) EUTMR/4(1)(e)(iii) EUTMD).Such a ground, considered quite niche if not altogether… [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 12:55 pm by Alessandro Cerri
The earlier marks had been registered for over 20 years and it was not for the Board of Appeal to rule on the Cypriot public's perception in the absence of any evidence to the contrary. [read post]
19 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
This obligation that is derived from the fundamental procedural principle of the right to be heard has also found an expression in A 112a(2)(d) in connection with R 104(a), in the context of substantial procedural violations.[2.2] In its response dated August 20, 2009, the [applicant] had filed a request for a “hearing” (“Anhörung”) in case the ED intended to refuse the present application […]. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 4:15 am
The SPC therefore rejected the retrial petition filed by Wuhan Zhongjun.CommentIn recent years, the volume of trade mark applications in China has continued to grow (by 20%-30% each year). [read post]