Search for: "Does 1-10" Results 5521 - 5540 of 41,658
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2016, 12:00 am by proliability13
If the initial judgment does not include an award of section 408.040 post-judgment interest and there is no timely request for such interest in an authorized post-judgment motion, the result is forfeiture of such interest. [read post]
5 May 2009, 4:42 am
The same does not hold true under Ohio's parallel statute. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 3:00 am by Biglaw Investor
You only need two things: (1) consistent financial returns and (2) time. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 10:42 am by Terry Hart
Focusing on originality, quality over quantity, and publishing less while spending more time on writing — does work. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 2:48 am by Dan
If this is not easy, continue discussing via email and phone, and pay for factory audits once you have narrowed your search down to 1 or 2 candidates. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 12:32 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Does the EPC confer jurisdiction on the EPO to determine whether a party validly claims to be a successor in title as referred to in Article 87(1)(b) EPC? [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 11:14 am
If it does not pass, then CMS will process all claims from June 1 on based on the reduced 2010 fee schedule. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 8:16 pm by Jim Gerl
Doe ex rel Doe 611 F.3d 888, 54 IDELR 275 (DC Cir 7/6/10) DC Circuit ruled that HO did not exceed his authority where he reduced a disciplinary suspension. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 8:00 am
How does it bring your business to mind - how you have protected your trade secrets or how you have not? [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 6:25 am by Sheldon Toplitt
John Does 1-10 (Case No. 12-cv-0240) includes counts alleging libel, defamation, false advertising and false designation of origin in violation of the Lanham Act [15 U.S.C. sec. 1125(a)].As reported by paidContent.org., Paul's organization faces the high hurdle of proving actual malice in its defamation claim and daunting odds pursuing its trademark infringement count, but the candidate and his organization have been nothing if not surprising thus far in overcoming… [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 7:06 pm by APransky
No 10-10 June 30, 2011, the Supreme Court addressed the question of is a court appointed attorney required in civil contempt proceedings for the collection of childsupport. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 2:29 pm by Anna Christensen
South Florida Water Management DistrictDocket: 10-196Issue(s): Whether all waters of the United States may be treated as a “unitary” whole for purposes of the Act's provisions requiring permits for point source discharges, so that transferring pollutants from one distinct water body to another does not constitute an “addition” of the pollutants to navigable waters and therefore does not require a permit.Certiorari-Stage DocumentsOpinion below… [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 9:34 pm by William S. Wilson
An important new federal law went into effect January 1, 2020 called the SECURE Act (Setting Every Community Up For Retirement Enhancement). [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 10:17 am by PaulKostro
Law Lessons from In The Matter of the Estate of INEZ BULL, CHANCERY DIVISION, PROBATE PART, ESX-CP-0084-10, Walter Koprowski, Jr., J.S.C., March 10, 2011: N.J.S.A. [read post]