Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 5521 - 5540
of 7,369
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2011, 2:45 am
By Otto Spijkers On the website of the Dutch Courts, you will find, in a few days, the English translation of the case in which the State of the Netherlands is held responsible for the death of three Muslim men after the fall of Srebrenica. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 2:21 am
(Patent Baristas) US: FDA’s Chief Counsel, Ralph Tyler, set to leave FDA (FDA Law Blog) US: Docs at BIO: Steve Burrill’s state of the biotechnology industry report 2011 (Patent Docs) US: Counterfeiting: White House IP Czar Victoria Espinel on working with corporations (BIOtechNOW) US: Banning gene patents will promote innovation? [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:44 pm
Sighted this morning, breaking the surface just off the Strand, the judgment of Mr Justice Arnold in MedImmune v Novartis [2011] EWHC 1669 (Pat) certainly fits the legend.In characteristic style, the judgment is as comprehensive as one would wish. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:55 am
Expert witnesses have enjoyed absolute immunity from suit under English law for over 400 years: however, following on from the decision of the House of Lords in Hall v Simons [2001] 1 AC 615 (advocates not immune from negligence claims), by a majority of 5 to 2 the Supreme Court held that the rule could no longer be justified. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 5:41 am
This is hardly an unprecedented state of affairs. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:28 am
In order to help practice this paper the ‘Centre d'Études Internationales de la Propriété Intellectuelle’ (CEIPI, for English speakers) is offering a new seminar for the pre-examination from 7 to 11 November 2011. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 12:39 am
v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 4:07 pm
Ctr., Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
This note compares the reasoning of the English court in Shamil Bank v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
This note compares the reasoning of the English court in Shamil Bank v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:30 am
O’Neill J. in the High Court in English v DPP [2009] IEHC 27 was critical of the absence of appropriate facilities in Garda Síóchána stations for the storage of evidence such as CCTV footage. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 5:49 pm
Judges are now entirely limited to (1) what the Virginia constitution specifies they can do, (2) what the English common law, as frozen in time in 1607 and writ in stone in the Tome of the Almighty and All-Encompassing Blackstone, allowed, and (3) what statutes allow.In one fell swoop, the Virginia Court of Appeals has changed Virginia from a Common Law State to Civil Code State. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 11:19 am
The firm's losing a demurrer when it sued State Farm (on Behnke's behalf) to recover fees allegedly owed.But heaven help him, Behnke stuck with 'em, and English & Gloven continues to represent him on appeal. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 6:22 am
Rosalind English has already examined the case in more detail. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 8:12 am
(v) If the answer to paragraph (iv) is in the affirmative, does Article 10 of Directive 2006/115 permit Member States to exempt hotel operators from the obligation to pay ‘a single equitable remuneration’ on the grounds of ‘private use’ within the meaning of Article 10(1)(a) of Directive 2006/115? [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 5:26 am
McIntyre Machinery v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 7:48 pm
Bennett and McComish v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 5:13 pm
We recommend section 1 be amended both to state the survival of common law innocent dissemination – as recently clarified in Metropolitan Schools v DesignTechnica [2009] EWHC 1765 (QB) – and to bring the scope of section 1 into line with the Ecommerce Directive -or better still, to delete the current section and cross-refer to the protection of the Directive. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 7:57 am
Goodyear v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:20 am
AM v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 710 (21 June 2011) ?? [read post]
