Search for: "English v. English"
Results 5521 - 5540
of 11,201
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2015, 2:28 am
This could be an interesting case - and reminds the CopyKat of the recent decision by Mr Justice Birss in Temple Island Collections Ltd v New English Teas Ltd & another [2012] EWPCC 1 where infringement was found, and the decision by a Korean appellate court that found that the 'recreation' of a photograph of a natural scene of pine trees on an island set against a skyline could not be infringement - although neither of those cases took 28… [read post]
24 Jan 2015, 4:55 pm
In the case of Pinto Pinheiro Marques v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 8:27 pm
The original document is circulating only among senior CCP and university officials; a summary has appeared via Xinhua but remains unavailable in English (See here and below). [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 8:42 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
Each volume covers a particular topic: v.1 (International Law and the Law of the European Communities; v.2 (Freedom of Speech); v.3 (Questions of Law Arising from German Unification); v.4 (The Law of Freedom of Faith and the Law of Freedom of the Churches); v.5 (Family-Related Decisions). [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 3:35 am
I covered the arguments in Plain English for this blog, with other coverage from Sam Hananel of the Associated Press (via Yahoo! [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 2:09 am
A rather fuller note on this decision by fellow blogger Eleonora, also summarising the not-yet-in-English Opinion of the Advocate General, can be found on the IPKat here (Eleonora has promised more to come ...). [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:56 pm
USA, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:06 pm
In Mosley v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 2:34 pm
A very interesting case just decided on Thursday, Caren EE. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:18 am
Let’s talk about the argument in Plain English. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:33 am
Indeed, Vogue was right and in fact today the Court of Appeal issued its decision in Fenty v Arcadia, confirming Birss J's judgment and holding that "the sale by Topshop of the t-shirt amounted to passing off. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 1:26 am
Eventually, the AG states that an anti-suit injunction cannot be qualified as a ground of non-recognition for a violation of public policy under article V (2)(b) NYC (paras 160 ff). [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 1:17 pm
Such was the case on Wednesday in Gelboim v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 11:45 am
Given how the November 4 oral argument unfolded, the Supreme Court’s seven-to-two decision on Wednesday to side with a former air marshal-turned-whistleblower in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 4:57 am
But yesterday’s oral argument in Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
Leggat v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 2:46 am
In Holt v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 6:17 pm
The full opinion in Holt v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 11:39 am
Last fall, the Court heard oral arguments in Holt v. [read post]
