Search for: "Gaines v. State"
Results 5521 - 5540
of 9,618
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2022, 4:18 pm
Supreme Court case, Mapp v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 5:34 am
The appellants in the recently decided case, Vento v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:00 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 9:08 pm
But there was a case that may help in making that argument, Jones v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 3:55 am
Thus the panel notes: * "Commercial gain as a motive for a website is not per se unacceptable. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 6:55 am
By Merrill BentCate v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 8:04 am
Virginia Matthews also stated in voir dire that she did not use Facebook. [read post]
6 May 2010, 11:07 am
Franklin Mint Company v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 11:33 am
The district court agreed, concluding that based on relevant precedents from the United States Supreme Court (in Clapper v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 3:16 pm
Hobby Lobby and Harris v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 9:07 am
†The petitions are Mac's Shell Service, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 5:49 pm
In the case of U.S. v Wilson (32 US 150) the Supreme Court stated that a pardon is like a gift that can be refused, upholding the notion in Burdick v U.S. (236 US 79). [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 10:34 pm
” In Landgraf v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 3:45 pm
One recent case in Georgia, Guthrie v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 6:00 am
The recent decision in Alta Energy Luxembourg S.a.r.l v The Queen[1](“Alta Energy“) might be a new high-water mark for taxpayers in treaty interpretation, but it may also be their last win. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 9:16 pm
This argument was rejected in United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 10:55 am
(See Craigslist, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 6:15 am
Here are a few examples: AHRI v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 12:19 pm
Finally, Vance v. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 7:30 am
Pozen is certainly correct that there is increasing discussion among academics and a few pundits and politicians about reforming the electoral college, but I think it remains to be seen whether it will genuine “gain traction” or simply founder on the shoals either of Article V, insofar as some of the proposed changes would undoubtedly require constitutional amendment, or on the determination by the Republican Party that the GOP probably benefits from… [read post]
