Search for: "Givens Group, Inc."
Results 5521 - 5540
of 6,189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2022, 7:30 am
Notice of assignment is often given to the borrower but not required at law. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:38 am
Grace & Company, Inc.,; Suzanne Gilbert is a veteran corporate executive with over 30 years of experience with the Interpublic Group of Companies (IPG); Larry Prendergast is Chairman of the Turrell Fund and serves on the advisory boards of several investment funds, including JPMorgan; and Joe Monteleone is a Partner at the Weber Gallagher Simpson Stapleton Fires & Newby LLP law firm. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 5:11 am
Woody Woo, Inc., 596 F.3d 577 (9th Cir. 2010). [read post]
4 May 2021, 1:08 pm
The largest SPAC deal to date was announced on 13 April 2021 when Grab Holdings Inc., a ride-hailing, food delivery and digital wallet group, announced recently that it would go public on the NASDAQ Stock Market via a $39.6 billion merger with Altimeter Growth Corp, a SPAC sponsored by Altimeter Capital.[4] Other recent SPAC activity includes the proposed acquisition of Liberty Tax, a leading tax return preparation service provider, and LoanMe, an established consumer and small… [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 5:01 pm
Ross Intelligence Inc. [read post]
23 Feb 2013, 5:00 pm
FTC Charges Against HTC America This week, the FTC announced that mobile device giant HTC American, Inc. [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:01 pm
A legal challenge to the Final Rule has already been filed by an insurance industry trade group in the U.S. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 4:47 pm
Section 1 – Serious harm A statement is no longer defamatory unless a claimant can show that ‘…its publication has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to [his/her] reputation…’ This section builds on the jurisprudence of Jameel v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] EWCA Civ 75 and Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) and is intended to deter trivial claims. [read post]
25 May 2022, 3:26 pm
"] From Judge Paul Crotty's decision yesterday in Upsolve, Inc. v. [read post]
9 May 2023, 4:51 pm
He had no current clients and, given his retirement, would have no future clients. [read post]
Do pregnant workers get ‘most-favored-employee’ status in High Court’s pregnancy accommodation case?
26 Mar 2015, 11:05 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., March 25, 2015, Breyer, S.). [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 11:55 am
By Cynthia Marcotte Stamer The Department of Health and Human Services Office of Civil Rights (OCR) has begun disclosing on its website the employer and other health plans, health care providers, health care clearinghouses and their business associates (Covered Entities) that report breaches of unsecured protected health information (UPIC) affecting more than 500 individuals as required by new rules enacted as part of the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act… [read post]
16 May 2023, 11:43 am
Ontario (“Working Families I”) and Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 12:28 pm
United States, 17-8, and a citizen’s group, in Upstate Citizens for Equality v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:23 pm
" As a result of this process, particularly given the concentration of concerns regarding the proposed route through the Sand Hills area of Nebraska, on November 10, 2011, the Department announced that it could not make a national interest determination regarding the permit application without additional information. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 5:05 pm
Canada The president of Surrey Creep Catchers, a controversial vigilante group that says it exposes child predators, is being sued for defamation for the second time in a month after he criticised sting operations on Facebook. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 8:47 am
A little history: in 1989, in the seminal Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 5:40 am
Consumers Union of US, Inc. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 6:41 am
In Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 8:58 am
American Booksellers Ass'n, Inc., 484 U.S. 383 (1988) The Humanitarian Law Project had standing to challenge a federal law that criminalized "knowingly provid[ing] material support to a foreign terrorist organization" because it had provided funds to groups designated as terrorist organizations prior to the law's enactment, and it stated its intention to keep doing so. [read post]
