Search for: "Husband v. Wife"
Results 5521 - 5540
of 6,703
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2010, 8:29 am
Shortly thereafter the husband issued an application for ancillary relief.When the case first came on for hearing in March 2009, Mr Justice Charles took the view that it was not then ready for trial on a central dispute of fact, namely that the wife had undisclosed substantial assets or ready access to such assets. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 4:12 am
" Creech v. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 11:33 am
In Kirkendale v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 1:19 pm
Jacobs v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 8:53 am
The Virginia Court of Appeals in the case of McCoy v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 12:26 pm
Kauttner, the wife filed for divorce and the husband requested a jury trial. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 6:02 am
The ex-husband moved to vacate key parts of the New Jersey divorce judgment, based on his claim that the ex-wife engaged in fraud and misrepresentation. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:29 am
In October, in Watermeir v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 7:20 am
She did not like his wife. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 6:42 pm
Read the whole case, Minch v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:29 am
According to him, after sending the disbursement sheet to the wife, showing her getting $34,839, he prepared one for the husband, which resulted in a “negative disbursement”: the husband would owe the firm money. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 2:14 pm
We first heard about this case last month through press reports, but have just come into possession of a copy of the court’s unpublished decision in A.G.R. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 3:50 am
This was the case in Dell'Osa v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 11:24 am
Hartelust v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 9:29 am
But these motives are no more to the point than the motives of the council that charged a husband for admission to their pool while letting his wife in free; this discrepancy arose out of the discriminatory pensionable age provisions and therefore the council’s entire innocent motives – of allowing people of pensionable age free admission – had a discriminatory basis (James v Eastleigh Borough Council [1990] 2 AC 751. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 7:27 pm
Such was the case in Lester v. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 4:23 pm
In the case of Gilliam v. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 2:51 pm
In the unpublished opinion of Argabright v. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 9:36 am
Plaintiff's wife was awarded $341,666 for the loss of her husband’s services for the eight years leading up to trial but nothing at all for future loss of services. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 8:54 pm
In Andrew T. v Yana T., 2009 N.Y. [read post]
