Search for: "Insurance Companies A,B" Results 5521 - 5540 of 8,130
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
The New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) has finalized amendments (“Amended Regulation”) to its cybersecurity rule (“Cybersecurity Rule”) that applies to financial institutions licensed by the NYDFS. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 1:23 pm by Jo Ann Hoffman & Associates, P.A.
Dependents can settle their weekly benefits by taking a lump sum of money, keeping in mind the insurance company’s right to commute (reduce) the future benefits to one-half. [read post]
Initially filed in 2013 by the National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies (“NAMIC”) and the American Insurance Association (“AIA”), the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint in April 2016 in which they allege that the 2013 Rule is inconsistent with Inclusive Communities. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 4:15 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
  Contrary to what you hear from some insurance companies and tort reform organizations, medical malpractice lawsuits don’t impact access to care, and don’t cause doctors to order unnecessary tests. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 2:35 pm by Law Lady
TODD CAMERON BISHOP, Appellee. 2nd District.Insurance -- Uninsured motorist -- New trial -- Trial court did not abuse discretion in granting insured plaintiff a new trial in action against insurer where court had entered summary judgment for plaintiff on liability, and jury awarded plaintiff zero damages upon finding that automobile accident was not a legal cause of any injuries to plaintiff -- Trial court did not abuse discretion by finding that jury verdict was contrary to… [read post]
18 May 2008, 8:26 am
Buy whole life insurance rather than term life insurance. 6. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 11:22 am by Virginia Hunt
 As with other impairment evaluations, the insurer may also contest the percentage of impairment,. [read post]
29 May 2015, 6:15 am by Daniel E. Cummins
As such, this evidence was found to have been properly excluded by the trial court.The court in Flenke also ruled that cross-examination pertaining to the expert's work for the defendant's insurance company was properly excluded, as it would have introduced the impermissible topic of insurance into the case.Based upon the above cases, the extent to which the veracity of lay and expert witnesses can be tested at trial has some limitations. [read post]