Search for: "John Doe 5 "
Results 5521 - 5540
of 7,645
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2024, 3:14 pm
In Sheetz, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment does not distinguish between legislative and administrative land use permit conditions. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 9:14 pm
Meanwhile, the law would immediately remake the voting membership of the Supreme Court from a 6 to 3 moderate, libertarian, and conservative Republican-appointed majority, into a Supreme Court with a 6 to 3 Progressive Democratic-appointed majority, and three Republican-appointed members without a vote on cases before the Supreme Court: Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 7:58 pm
UPDATE: Texas Supreme Court denied review 5/24/2019 CLAIM-FRACTURING CUM APPELLATE GALORE Natgasoline LLC v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 11:42 am
Section 5(C). 4. [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:44 am
A U.S. multinational corporation operating in Germany would face the German corporate tax of 30 percent plus the additional 5 percent U.S. tax on German earnings repatriated to the United States. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:19 am
These include (1) the movement toward alignment of public policy and private activity (especially in the context of economic activities); (2) governmentalization of private sector activity; (3) the rise of compliance based accountability (quality control) governance; (4) the revolution in the normative valuation of human rights and sustainability as both a set of culturally superior expectations and legal requirements; (5) the revolution in the methods of assessment and accountability; and… [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 4:08 pm
John Taylor v. [read post]
5 Mar 2025, 6:34 pm
This assessment matters because the CRA does not contemplate congressional review of adjudications or of rules of particular applicability, only rules of general applicability. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 5:41 pm
See also John G. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
Yet the privilege does not cover entering into an attorney-client relationship or engaging in particular communications aimed at furthering an ongoing or future crime or fraud. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 7:20 pm
Purchasing software and services that do more than is needed is costly because the customer is paying for things he or she does not need. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 3:31 am
What he does not point out is that Congress may only do so prospectively. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 4:05 pm
CCA Section 40(6) This section does not apply until such time as a body is first recognised as an approved regulator. [read post]
27 May 2008, 10:06 am
Stephens County, No. 07-10729 In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action for allegedly causing or failing to prevent the jailhouse death of plaintiff's son, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where: 1) denial of leave to amend the complaint to name five of the "John Doe" defendants was proper since the statute of limitations rendered amendment futile; and 2) there was insufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to conclude that sheriff personally caused the death or… [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 4:03 pm
Notice Following the decision of Mr Justice Tugendhat in the John Terry case ([2010] EWHC 119 (QB)) any party seeking an interim non-disclosure order should be in no doubt of its duties to notify known interested parties. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
Based on the inherent plausibility of the facts alleged in the indictment, the Senate could, by a vote of two thirds of its members, use its power to expel Menendez, pursuant to Article I, Section 5 of the Constitution. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm
-John 192 Cal.App.4th 90 (2011) MEGAN KUCKER et al., as Trustees, etc., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm
-John 192 Cal.App.4th 90 (2011) MEGAN KUCKER et al., as Trustees, etc., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:00 pm
However, the law does not go quite so far. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 5:56 am
” Regardless of where one comes down on this debate, it is notable that Cornyn seems to leave some room for the idea that the Justice for Victims of War Crimes Act does not on its face preclude retroactive application and that the legislation would leave the federal courts as the ultimate arbiter of this issue. 5. [read post]
