Search for: "Light v. State Bar"
Results 5521 - 5540
of 5,599
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2007, 4:50 pm
Co v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 12:56 pm
State Supreme Court Justice Bernard J. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 10:51 am
Co v. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 7:42 pm
The State appeals the district court judgment on both grounds, and argues additionally that Ege's habeas petition is time-barred under the one-year limitations period of 28 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 9:35 am
The Court heard argument on Monday in United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 12:41 pm
The state trial court denied habeas relief on the ground that Smith was procedurally barred from raising the same claim previously denied on direct review. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 6:23 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 9:17 pm
As these numbers are the primary considerations in law school admissions, poor scores can have the potential to bar applicants from admission to their ideal schools. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 6:02 am
Earlier, in Pfizer v. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 1:11 am
The ruling is the first upholding a federal ban on a specific abortion procedure since the Court declared the right to an abortion in Roe v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 2:17 am
Case Name: Rawle v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 12:12 pm
Dissenting Member Walsh stated: Sound policy considerations underlie the statute's requirement that the showing of interest supporting a deauthorization election must be collected after the employees are subject to a union-security clause. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 9:29 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Wenbo Ha v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 5:51 pm
" In addition, it does quote from Newman v Eagle Bldg Techs in relation to the relevance of a lead plaintiff’s location: “In light of today’s travel and communication methods, the geographical location of the [foreign lead plaintiff movants] is irrelevant. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 8:27 am
In fact, in his motion, Padilla relies heavily on United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 2:02 am
The defendants claimed that they were entitled to statutory immunity for the state law claims but the court rejected that as a basis for summary judgment because on the facts taken in the light most favorable to Sykes there was evidence sufficient for a jury to find actual malice, which would preclude qualified immunity. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 6:51 am
Kamins, the president of the New York City Bar Association, and Daniel R. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 4:26 am
Kamins, the president of the New York City Bar Association, and Daniel R. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 11:39 am
Kremer argued that the First Amendment protects his registration and use of bosleymedical.com, and bars application of state trademark law in the action. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 9:11 am
In Sykes v. [read post]
