Search for: "MATTER OF A R"
Results 5521 - 5540
of 114,123
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2016, 4:43 pm
Oscar R. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 6:22 am
Lyon of Rock Springs, Wyoming.Representing Kaczmarek: James R. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 3:16 pm
Addleman and Gary R. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 1:17 pm
Williams and Tara R. [read post]
17 Jan 2009, 9:00 pm
Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, R-Miami, was skeptical. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 2:58 pm
By Kurt R. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 2:51 pm
By Kurt R. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 10:21 am
By Kurt R. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 10:12 am
By Kurt R. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 1:42 pm
Walsh & John R. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 5:58 pm
Koustas & John R. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:45 pm
By Kurt R. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 5:54 am
By Kurt R. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 4:19 pm
By Riëtte van Laack & John R. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 1:21 pm
Fred Upton, R-MI, and Ed Whitfield, R-KY, that is being considered in the House Energy and Commerce Committee. [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 6:43 am
Garton, R-Columbus. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 2:05 am
Lord Hughes, giving the judgment of the Court, reviewed the authorities, emphasising that the question of substantial impairment required consideration of whether there had been a serious degree of impairment, and such degree was a matter for the jury. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 6:05 pm
The FBI concluded its probe earlier this year and recommended not bringing charges in the matter. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 2:40 am
By a majority, the Supreme Court substantially agreed with the conclusion of the Court of Appeal, but because of further evidence from the prosecution’s expert produced after the judgment of the Court of Appeal, it allowed the appeal to the limited extent of remitting the matter to the judge for further consideration in the light of that further evidence and the judgment of the Supreme Court. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 2:50 am
As sentencing isa matter for the judge in English law, giving the sentence of Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) rather than an Extended Sentence for Public Protection (EPP) was lawful, and did not offend against the principle of ‘lex mitior’ as the maximum sentence for the appellant’s crime was the same under either IPP or EPP. [read post]
