Search for: "Pass v. State"
Results 5521 - 5540
of 28,422
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2016, 6:19 pm
Filburn, Lopez, and United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 11:41 am
While incorrect, the notion was apparently “rational enough” to pass constitutional muster in the Court’s eyes. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 6:50 am
The state high court first looked to its own precedent for guidance. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:14 am
R (HS2 Action Alliance Ltd) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor, R (Heathrow Hub Limited & Anor) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor, and R (Buckinghamshire County Council & Ors) v The Secretary of State for Transport, heard 15 – 16 October 2013. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:14 am
R (HS2 Action Alliance Ltd) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor, R (Heathrow Hub Limited & Anor) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor, and R (Buckinghamshire County Council & Ors) v The Secretary of State for Transport, heard 15 – 16 October 2013. [read post]
3 May 2011, 6:45 am
Clinton is an effort by a U.S. citizen born in Jerusalem to have “Israel” listed as his birthplace on his passport; the State Department’s long-standing policy is to maintain neutrality with regard to the status of Jerusalem, but in 2002 Congress passed a law instructing the State Department to list Israel as the place of birth for Americans born in Jerusalem. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 9:27 pm
-- Turner v McKesson Corp, Case No. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 3:26 pm
On April 14, 2024, the United States Sentencing Commission (USSC) unanimously voted to pass a package of federal sentencing reforms dealing with acquitted conduct and age considerations. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 10:09 am
The United States Supreme Court has moved a giant leap forward in LGBTQ+ rights with the latest opinion in Bostock v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 5:31 am
Consider the Seventh Circuit’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 3:09 am
A 1990 decision, State v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 10:16 am
In the case of Schade v. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 10:59 am
The closest one finds is the 14th Amendment, except that it only authorizes penal legislation applicable to state actors, not to private persons generally, and the offenders in this case were not state actors.The authority cited for all of these charges is the Commerce Clause, interpreted as authorizing criminal penalties under the Necessary and Proper Clause, mainly based on the Supreme Court precedent in Wickard v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 9:56 pm
Classen Immunotherapies v. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 6:12 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 4:56 am
It contained a letter and a package and the letterexpressed a willingness to pass [Hoffman] `generous compensation in exchange for special help and information. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:47 pm
But only thirty years after that, in the 1930s, Congress changed policy again, and passed a law that permitted the re-establishment of tribal courts in Oklahoma. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 12:50 am
Overstock.com, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 2:03 am
In particular, Kitchin LJ in Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp [2017] EWCA Civ 1834 considered a number of rulings of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in the context of ‘targeting’ towards specific Member States. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 12:43 pm
Luke Hospital, Inc. v. [read post]
