Search for: "People v J."
Results 5521 - 5540
of 7,271
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
There may be further additions and comments as people get a chance/have a brainwave. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:13 am
by Philip J. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 9:01 pm
" —Chapman v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
In Metropolitan International Schools v Designtechnica [2009] EWHC 1765 (QB) at [35] Eady J commented that it was “surprising how little authority there is within this jurisdiction applying the common law of publication or its modern statutory refinements to internet communications”, and the same is the case in Australia[5]. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
Hoekstra, Ph.D., Frederick J. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 11:56 am
Lofts, Steve Lowry, Gregory V. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:33 am
Possible relevance for Ireland Our Housing Act 1966 bears striking resemblance to the 1996 Act in the UK, especially inasmuch as a District Court judge is required (“shall”, s. 62; Dublin Corporation v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
You can’t have such incompetent people driving taxis, people who know so little about the city, and think that they took actual exams. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 6:50 am
., at 297 (opinion of Kennedy , J.). [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
Even when modernizing the law of comment (WIC Radio & Mair v Simpson [2008] 2 SCR 420) and creating a new “public interest responsible communication” defence (Grant v Torstar Corp [2009] SCC 61) the court failed to take the step of importing Charter analysis or standards into the common law[12] As to the English solution of Reynolds, Eady J comments sadly that the Reynolds defence “seems hardly ever to be used in litigation. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 3:52 pm
-Adrian J. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:04 am
Coogan and Gray v News Group Newspapers, heard 14, 15 and 16 February 2011 (Vos J) [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 12:48 pm
The Family Court recently ordered that the mother have sole parental responsibility for a child, J, aged 4, and that the father shall not spend time with the child or communicate with the child. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 10:40 pm
That approach was adopted by Strickland J in Parker v Parker [2010] FamCA 664 (3 August 2010). [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 7:53 pm
The mother asserts that J, aged not yet 6 at the time, “puts on an act” out of fear of his father. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 4:24 am
Some bear a striking resemblance to Governor William J. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 10:00 pm
No prospect of success Given that this was a strike out application, Lanstaff J did not have to reach any final determination on these claims. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 11:47 am
Corop. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
Tugendhat J was therefore bound by the Court of Appeal’s decision in Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Bairstow [2003] EWCA Viv 321; [2004] Ch 1. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:58 am
J. [read post]
