Search for: "State v. Country"
Results 5521 - 5540
of 26,689
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2014, 7:00 am
Olson and Boies, who worked as opposing counsel in Bush v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 9:06 am
In Lindo v. [read post]
14 Apr 2007, 7:48 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 5:00 am
Herrick v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 5:29 pm
Wong v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 10:00 am
Jennings v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 11:56 am
Claimants have challenged State measures including upfront expropriations or mere State regulatory decisions in different industries spanning from the financial sector (Abaclat v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 9:02 am
Claimants have challenged State measures including upfront expropriations or mere State regulatory decisions in different industries spanning from the financial sector (Abaclat v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 1:04 pm
” ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Jeffrey Kahn presented his observations from oral arguments in Georgia v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 11:11 am
Sarah Grant dissected the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in Karnoski v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 1:33 am
The United States Supreme Court (USSC) is today hearing oral arguments in Alice Corp v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 6:13 am
That happened recently in Bowman v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 12:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 1:14 am
That said, he is not critical for the sake of it:"To prevent any misunderstanding about my approach to IPL I wish to state at the outset that I have always maintained that IPL tends to be greedy and that some aspects or manifestations do not necessarily serve the interests of a developing country. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 7:39 am
v=tlBsG1UJoLcThe EU Parliament is not a true lawmaking body that can make laws for citizens of EU countries that are lawfully enforceable. [read post]
2 May 2011, 2:49 pm
Professor Rebecca Tsosie Part 2: The Doctrine of Discovery in the United States, New Zealand, and Beyond View presentation here Johnson v. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 8:14 am
Interestingly, the EDPB states that if personal data is accessed remotely from a third country, this does not necessarily constitute a “transfer” if the data is accessed by an employee who is “an integral part of the EU-based controller” – here, the EDPB gives the example of an employee of an EU-based controller who is only temporarily in a third country on a business trip. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 9:42 am
In Shah v Federbush, 2019 WL 5060496 ( S.D. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 9:06 pm
Arguing for the state of Michigan in Schuette v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 7:56 am
In Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
