Search for: "State v. Howes" Results 5521 - 5540 of 72,689
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2025, 1:41 pm by Eric Goldman
Pandabuy eventually showed up in court and explained how it “operates more like a passive facilitator than a seller or manufacturer. [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 7:25 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Another item of note is how the “loss of value to the PII” argument fared. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 6:03 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Fortunately, she was not injured in the incident, but it is not hard to see how that could happen. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 3:37 pm by Arthur F. Coon
On July 7, 2017, the California Supreme Court filed its 69-page opinion, written by Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye and joined by five other justices, in Friends of the Eel River v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 3:37 pm by Arthur F. Coon
On July 7, 2017, the California Supreme Court filed its 69-page opinion, written by Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye and joined by five other justices, in Friends of the Eel River v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 12:49 pm by Linda McClain
"Wallenstein’s observation about how much and how little changes comes to mind in considering another significant Supreme Court case about impermissible race discrimination and family life, Palmore v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 1:40 am by mtpham2@illinois.edu
In the United States, the most recent attempt to balance business interests and consumer concerns has come from California, in the form of the California Consumer Protection Act (the “CCPA,” or the “Act”), which went into effect January 1, 2020.[1]  The Act has created a seemingly robust set of rights for consumers to know what information businesses have about them, what is being done with that information, and how they may request to delete such… [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 2:18 pm by Unknown
United States (Treaty Rights; Health Care)Pasqua Yaqui Tribe v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 12:28 pm by Susan Klein
That system lasted until 2005, when the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]