Search for: "State v. Levell "
Results 5521 - 5540
of 29,472
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2020, 9:59 am
The decision in Rutledge v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 9:37 am
Texas v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 5:47 am
Estes v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 5:01 am
But that claim raises an interesting question: Are the United States’s sister democracies doing any better than the United States in countering disinformation? [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 5:15 pm
United StatesUnited States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 10:23 am
” After surveying a variety of different lawsuits against government officials, at both the federal and state and local levels, Thomas concluded that money damages “have long been awarded as appropriate relief. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 7:53 pm
Serious concerns had been raised against UK authorities, alleging that they did not genuinely intend to pursue prosecutions against their own service members and higher-level officials. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 6:49 pm
Program v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 11:52 am
The plaintiff learned this the hard way in the case of Sarah Leitner v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 11:28 am
FAR 33.103(d)(2)(v)-(vi). [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 7:33 am
Unites States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 7:21 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 7:09 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 2:10 pm
The Court of Appeals recent decision in State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 7:45 am
Both cases revolve around the 1976 Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), a statute that defines the jurisdiction of US courts in lawsuits against foreign nations at either the federal or state level. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 7:28 am
(The third category of civil service position is the Senior Executive Service, which is made up of executives who serve at the highest levels of the federal government.) [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 7:15 am
” Here, even if the manager’s alleged conduct rose to the level of “extreme and outrageous,” the applicant failed to state an IIED claim against the franchisee because the conduct did not plausibly occur within the scope of his employment. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 6:02 am
In this sense, the CJEU reasoned that paragraph 1 in that provision must be interpreted as allowing a court of a Member State to apply a convention concluded between a Member State of the EU and a non-member State before 1 January 1958 or, for States acceding to the EU, before the date of their accession, such as the Convention between Switzerland and Germany concerning the Reciprocal Protection of Patents, Designs and Trademarks, signed in Berlin on 13 April… [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 5:01 am
Pena-Irala, Kadic v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]
