Search for: "State v. Lively" Results 5521 - 5540 of 25,482
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2014, 3:19 am by Laura Sandwell
The hearing can be followed on Supreme Court Live. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 11:20 am by Brad Pauley
As we’ve previously mentioned, the Supreme Court has set oral argument in Perry v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
OMIG had issued its final audit report of an assisted living facility's [Facility] Assisted Living Program applications for Medicaid reimbursement and commenced efforts to recover alleged over-payments made to Facility. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
OMIG had issued its final audit report of an assisted living facility's [Facility] Assisted Living Program applications for Medicaid reimbursement and commenced efforts to recover alleged over-payments made to Facility. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 6:42 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Plus, we have the warranty of habitability that state law imposes on landlords to ensure the tenants have a safe living environment. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:06 am by Gene Quinn
Earlier today the United States Supreme Court denied Microsoft Corporation’s petition for writ of certiorari in Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 9:29 am
He deserves to live the remainder of his life behind bars, and that's what will happen. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 6:39 pm
He has lived in the Los Angeles metropolitan area for over thirty years with his wife, also a lawful permanent resident. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 2:00 pm
On October 27, 2006, the trial court sentenced defendant to three years in state prison. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 5:13 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
 Similarly, Barry Swadron, the Toronto lawyer representing Wawrzyniak in her lawsuit against Sunnybrook Health, says her suit "could be the thin edge of the wedge in terms of doctors deciding who’s going to live and who’s going to die. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 6:27 am by richardholmesblog
This case highlights the importance of landlords and tenants alike being aware of their rights and obligations when it comes to deposits and the legal consequences of a tenant remaining in occupation of premises beyond the period stated in the agreement. [read post]