Search for: "State v. Minor" Results 5521 - 5540 of 16,407
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2010, 12:21 pm by Lyle Denniston
The new case is Simmons, et al., v. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 6:00 am
In a new and interesting working paper, Ilya Somin (George Mason) examines the political backlash against the Supreme Court decision in Kelo v. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 6:16 am by Cannabis Law Group
This is true despite the fact that data overwhelmingly shows there is very little variation in the percentage of whites v. blacks who use the drug. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 7:29 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Being a highly-regarded Indian law and policy law prof or polisci prof is like being a highly-regarded minor league baseball player. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 6:38 am by INFORRM
‘The Court also finds that, when the applicant company stated that RR had been arrested and was being questioned by the police, it did not act in a responsible way, particularly as it knew that the news was widely disseminated via media outlets both domestically and internationally. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 2:00 am by John Day
Brown, 160 S.W.3d 462 (Tenn. 2005) (holding that an “adult host had duty to exercise reasonable care to protect minor guests and third person from risks associated with drinking and driving”); Burse v. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 12:55 pm by Sandy Levinson
"This is like saying "country rejects the ERA," whereas the correct story is that because of our indefensible amendment procedures set out by Article V, it really doesn't matter if a majority of the population in a majority of the states supports an amendment; it still goes down. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 4:27 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro and Devin Watkins discuss Buehler v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:39 am by Peter Mahler
The case is called Verghetta v Lawlor, and you can read here Justice Scheinkman’s 33-page post-trial decision dated March 9, 2016, the opening paragraph of which aptly sets the stage for the fair-value drama that follows, starring dueling appraisals over two thousand percent apart: This Court is called upon to determine the value of two corporate entities for purposes of permitting the buy-out of a minority shareholder. [read post]