Search for: "State v. P. B." Results 5521 - 5540 of 6,786
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2015, 2:59 pm
The answer is clear from C-182/14 P MEGA Brands International v OHIM (the 'MAGNEXT' case), in which the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) set aside the General Court's decision and remitted the action for further consideration.As already reported by the IPKat here, the story began when the Luxembourg company MEGA Brands applied for two CTMs for MAGNEXT. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 8:38 am
  For this proposition, C&L cited one of our favorite cases:  United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 4:58 am by Marcel Pemsel
Court of Justice of the EU, Bundesverband Souvenir - Geschenke - Ehrenpreise v EUIPO, C-488/16 P, at para. 38). [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 7:59 am
Furthermore, the CPVO has a broad discretion to declare a plant variety right null and void under Article 20 of the Basic Regulation, which it exercises on the basis of the evidence submitted to it by the applicant for a declaration of nullity (see Brookfield New Zealand and Elaris v CPVO and Schniga C-534/10 P). [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 6:16 am
Case Name: Jackson Hole Mountain Resort Corp. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:03 pm
Dec. 14,2007) (opinion grantingmotion for stay of execution) ("District Court Opinion"), and is attached to the Application asAppendix B. [read post]