Search for: "State v. Sales" Results 5521 - 5540 of 20,288
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2007, 6:10 pm
Baron interfered with Natanzon's business interests by "frustrating ERN's and Natanzon's ability to devote" their full time to the operation of their business.The Court held that Natanzon had failed to allege sufficient facts to establish either a contract with ISOs or a likelihood of a prospective business relationship with any identified ISOs, and dismissed the claim for failure to state a claim on which relief might be granted.3. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 5:57 pm by Anthony Gaughan
Yesterday the Supreme Court declined to hear the case of Gee v. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 5:00 am by John Jascob
This list includes (among others) (i) publicly traded companies, (ii) 501(c) tax exempt entities under the Internal Revenue Code, (iii) certain pooled investment vehicles, (iv) any entity that (a) employs more than 20 employees on a full-time basis in the United States, (b) filed in the previous year's federal income tax returns more than $5,000,000 in gross receipts or sales in the aggregate (including the receipts or sales of other entities owned by the entity and… [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 4:24 am
The judge ruled in August that the state must pay the legal costs of the video-game industry, which successfully blocked the Democratic governor's plan to prohibit the sale of violent and sexually explicit video games to minors. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 1:00 am by Jeramie Fortenberry
  No state has jurisdiction over real estate located in another state.Unlike property jurisdiction, one court can have jurisdiction over a person that is living in another state. [read post]
15 May 2022, 11:02 am by Giles Peaker
No active decision or step needs to be taken by the Secretary of State. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 1:15 pm
While the question of sale of sex toys does not loom large as an issue of burning national importance for the Supreme Court to address, a circuit split over the meaning of Lawrence v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 5:03 am
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements are Valid under Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) and California’s Discover Bank Rule, Which Found Such Waivers Unenforceable as Unconscionable Under State Law, is Preempted by the FAA Supreme Court Holds Plaintiffs filed a putative class action in California federal court against AT&T Mobility, with whom they had cellular telephone service, alleging “false advertising and fraud by charging sales tax on phones it… [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 6:53 am by Arina Shulga
As to Ether, Director Hinman stated: “…the present state of Ether, the Ethereum network, and its decentralized structure, current offers, and sales of Ether are not securities transactions. [read post]