Search for: "State v. Sessions"
Results 5521 - 5540
of 6,580
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2023, 10:44 am
Precedents like Train v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 8:57 am
Michigan v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 7:40 pm
Party Constitution CPPCC Constitution State Constitution 1945 Amendment VI 1949 Common Program 1954 Amendment I Constitution Promulgated 1956 Amendment VII 1969 Amendment VIII 1973 Amendment IX 1975 Amendment I 1977 Amendment X 1978 Amendment II Amendment II 1982 Amendment XI Amendment III Amendment III 1987 Amendment XII 1988 Amendment IV 1992 Amendment XIII 1993 Amendment V 1994 Amendment IV 1997 Amendment… [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 5:20 am
” Cobb v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 5:53 pm
The case is also interesting because it was brought entirely under California state law. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
Introduction Chairman Leahy, Ranking Member Sessions and members of the Committee, thank you for inviting me to appear before you today. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 11:15 am
This was amply demonstrated by our sessions in Barcelona where a number of participants, particularly those with experience in ICSID or in private practice, indicated why states and investors may sometimes want to keep their disputes and what happens to them under wraps. [read post]
2 Sep 2018, 11:31 am
Chapter V of GDPR governs the legality of transfers of personal data to third countries and allows for the transfer of data to a third country when the EC decides that “a third country...ensures an adequate level of protection” or when there are appropriate safeguards in place. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 5:32 pm
Republican Senator Jeff Sessions of Alabama, voted against the stimulus package, stating he did not feel it was good for America. [31] He referred to the plan as a "political stimulus package" [rather] than a real package that would impact our economy in any significant way. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 4:36 am
In 1892, the Supreme Court upheld Reed’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 8:11 am
Judge McAfee captioned his order as “State of Georgia v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:20 am
’ In re Application of the United States for Historical Cell Site Data, supra. [read post]
Patent office and Qualcomm's litigation tactics render prof's fanboy testimony on patents unreliable
23 Jan 2019, 8:08 am
The combination of two Apple v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm
Part V concludes with a report card on how the regime is doing on its thirtieth anniversary. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 9:02 am
Of particular interest to Episcopalians is the current case in Massachusetts of Gill v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 8:18 pm
See also, United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm
According to the USSC: 9% had little or no prior criminal history (Criminal History Category I); 7% were CHC II; 8% were CHC III; 2% were CHC IV; 5% were CHC V; 9% were CHC VI. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:52 am
Mischon de Reya’s Data Matters blog has published a podcast, The News Sessions, with the first instalment focusing on key areas of GDPR compliance. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
(The Prior Art) Ways to avoid a USPTO ethics investigation (IP Updates) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Qualcomm penalised for failure to disclose patents to standard setting organisation and for litigation misconduct in failing to produce evidence: Qualcomm Inc v Broadcom Corp (IP Law Observer) (Patently-O) (Promote the Progress) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) (PLI) CAFC upholds judgment enjoining inventor from asserting patent against Unitronics or its… [read post]
