Search for: "State v. Tell"
Results 5521 - 5540
of 20,788
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2012, 4:02 pm
On February 15, 1990 the case of the People of the State of New York, Respondent v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 2:51 pm
Or telling the truth, for that matter. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
2 Oct 2006, 9:31 am
Time will tell which of these two opinions, the one granting penalty phase relief or the one denying it, has more far-reaching impact.The panel granted penalty phase relief in Outten v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 8:20 am
Suffice it to say that those “super” adjectives have not, so far as I can tell, previously graced the United States Reports. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 6:33 am
Pfizer argued that, even though no UK rights could be enforced, a declaration would be useful because of it potential influence in Belgium, a EPC state that was still designated in the EP applications. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 8:34 am
Phelps, and United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 7:39 am
Exxon v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 11:25 am
The North Carolina Supreme Court issued its ruling in North Carolina Department of Corrections v. [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 11:19 am
And as the briefs note, those companies invest huge amounts in R&D and hold vast numbers of patents.Unfortunately, Macomm Delrahim can make--or tell his subordinates to make--filings in the name of "the United States. [read post]
11 Aug 2006, 8:02 pm
In this year's Davis v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 10:25 am
" I'll tell you a secret. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 5:46 pm
" (emphasis added)Regardless of the party to be reproached (here, Epic, but in other contexts it would also apply to Apple), I think courts should do this more often and tell parties very clearly when their lawyers persistently engage in framing to the extent that it is an insult to human intelligence. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 3:29 am
The first was Wednesday’s oral argument in the Supreme Court in Connick v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 1:02 pm
State v. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 3:13 pm
Of course, the verdicts, which were about 6% of all trade secret cases filed, are subject to the same selection effects as any other verdict analysis - there is a whole array of cases (more than 2000 of them in the federal system alone) that never made it this far, and we don't know what the tried cases tells us about the shorter-lived cases.The study offers a lot of details: amounts of awards, states with the highest awards, states with the most litigation, judge… [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 7:03 am
Snowden, furor over Bill C-13 and the Supreme Court of Canada decision in R. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 6:45 pm
In 2016, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the use of Section 702 in United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 9:34 am
For the Symposium on Administrative Reform of Immigration LawIllegal Immigration v. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 11:35 am
Android smartphones may also be smartphones, but they are not iPhones, so they are not "like" articles (which would count as a potential replacement under the ITC's rules).In the Epic Games v. [read post]
