Search for: "Styles v. State"
Results 5521 - 5540
of 5,645
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2014, 11:24 am
Simply stated, the non-assignment clause prevents him from selling the assets of his company (e.g., publishing contracts) without the prior written approval of his authors. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 5:30 pm
” (Lester v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 11:37 am
Corp. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 11:50 am
Take, for example, the chestnut case of Batsakis v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 10:06 am
Consider the FAA regulations analyzed in Florida v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 4:47 pm
I'm glad the experiment with style over substance is ending; I'll be happier when it's over. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 8:16 pm
" [1] There have been similar moves taken by Steinbröck's counterparts in the States. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
Talk about your smoke filled rooms, Valley-style. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 9:26 pm
In 1776 he served as a delegate to the state constitutional convention, where he made a mark as a thoughtful and devoted public servant. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 5:30 pm
” (Lester v. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 6:34 am
That post is So You Want To Be An International/China Lawyer, Part V. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 1:39 am
Vila v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 9:01 pm
(For purposes of the discussion, the participants really didn’t draw many distinctions between public and private universities, since most prominent private universities try to hold themselves—sometimes, as in California, because state law requires them to do so—to the same First Amendment standards that bind public institutions. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 4:11 am
Kahn v. [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 11:37 am
From yesterday's decision in Moms for Liberty-Brevard County v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 8:27 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2015)The general offices of the Central Party and State Council recently issued a directive calling for the strengthening of civic education in Chinese universities along the ideological lines specified through the Chinese Communist Party. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:23 pm
See for example Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] UKHL 22, pa 132, where Baroness Hale sums it up: “The 1998 Act does not create any new cause of action between private persons. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm
Under Miranda v. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 4:30 am
The biggest question: at what level of granularity do you need to state the "want" at issue? [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 1:23 pm
The court doesn’t insist that the board members should have stated they were not independent. [read post]
