Search for: "United States Court of Appeals,third Circuit"
Results 5521 - 5540
of 6,585
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2015, 11:01 am
In December 2013, the Third Circuit held that the federal agents had qualified immunity, which I find kind of unbelievable. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:52 am
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit recently commented on this key distinction between European disclosure and American discovery when it observed that “the German legal system . . . does not authorize discovery in the sense of Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 10:06 am
”[vi] On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 5:01 am
" As he feared, Xu was fired from his job and was unable to find other employment in the United States or China. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 3:33 pm
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit’s 141-page opinion upholding Kapoor’s conviction intact as powerful precedent to use against crooked pharmaceutical executives. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 7:02 am
Skilling came as a result of Sri Srinivasan’s successful appeal of his convictions to the United States Supreme Court (Gaille Energy Blog Issue 18 Justice Scalia, Justice-in-Waiting Srinivasan, and Senator Cruz). [read post]
30 Jan 2025, 9:26 am
Skilling came as a result of Sri Srinivasan’s successful appeal of his convictions to the United States Supreme Court (Gaille Energy Blog Issue 18 Justice Scalia, Justice-in-Waiting Srinivasan, and Senator Cruz). [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 7:02 am
Skilling came as a result of Sri Srinivasan’s successful appeal of his convictions to the United States Supreme Court (Gaille Energy Blog Issue 18 Justice Scalia, Justice-in-Waiting Srinivasan, and Senator Cruz). [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 12:00 pm
§ 141 reads as follows: A patent owner, or a third-party requester in an inter partes reexamination proceeding, who is in any reexamination proceeding dissatisfied with the final decision in an appeal to the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences under section 134 may appeal the decision only to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 9:27 am
He argued that the concealment of the murals resulted in both an impermissible modification and destruction of his works, but the United States District Court for the District of Vermont disagreed.[15] Denying the injunction, the district court held that under VARA, the modification or destruction of a work of visual art requires a physical alteration to the work itself.[16] After the district court’s preliminary ruling, it granted VLS’s… [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am
United States, 14-29, a case seeking to clarify several standards regarding insider trading. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 8:31 pm
(Seattle Trademark Lawyer) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Lawsuits and strategic steps Google – Plaintiff-side briefs submitted in 4th Circuit appeal in Rosetta Stone v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am
(Docket Report) District Court N D California: False advertisement through third parties may constitute false marking, but facts must be pled with particularity: United States of America, ex. rel., et. al. v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:10 am
(IPblog) US General – Decisions District Court E D Wisconsin: Can a trade secret licensee state a claim? [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 12:54 pm
There've been a raft of good decisions, although none from the United States Supreme Court, for all us practitioners on the right (in more ways than one) side of the “v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 2:00 am
Federal: The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reinstates a hostile work environment, disparate treatment, and retaliation lawsuit against General Motors, noting that economic harm is not required for an employment decision to be actionable under Title VII. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 4:38 am
See generally United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 9:13 am
" So too has the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held that "derogatory characterizations without more are not defamatory," concluding that "a simple accusation of racism is not enough. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:45 am
While in the United States, [Diamreyan] made no effort to obtain legitimate employment or to advance his education; instead, he continued his involvement in the scheme to defraud.Brief for the United States of America, U.S. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:33 am
If the Court were (as it should) understand RFRA merely to incorporate the Court’s pre-Smith free exercise jurisprudence, then the answer would be easy: Of course not. [read post]
