Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 5521 - 5540
of 10,392
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2021, 6:53 am
[See SDL Hair Ltd v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:35 pm
" United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm
(Public Knowledge) Michael Geist presentation: ACTA – The state of play (Michael Geist) Australia I thought cats were colour blind… Federal Court confirms Mars has exclusive right to use colour ‘Whiskas purple’ for cat food: Mars Australia Pty Ltd (formerly Effem Foods Pty Ltd) v Société des Produits Nestlé SA (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) FCAFC: On appeal, simulated flames from direct light found infringing: Bitech… [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:28 am
– EIPR article (PatLit) United States US Patent Reform Dr. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 11:51 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 12:33 pm
In Barbulescu v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 12:33 pm
In Barbulescu v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm
United States. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 8:43 am
§ 1983, provides: Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State ... subjects ... any citizen of the United States ... to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law[.] [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 7:14 am
Moroccanoil, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:19 am
The state points to the two earlier versions of the order, which targeted Muslim countries, as well as comments and tweets made by the president calling for a ban on the entry of Muslims into the United States. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 3:54 am
At Bloomberg Law, Kimberly Robinson reports that the ruling in Barton “has made it harder for longtime green card holders with a criminal conviction to remain in the United States. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm
Several decades later, Judge Mark H. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 11:54 am
Compare United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 10:01 pm
South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 12:55 pm
Synergy Sport International, Ltd. v United States, 17 C.I.T. 18 (1993).Customs cites many difficulties with the application of the First Sale Rule as the reasons for the proposed change. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 7:55 pm
Synergy Sport International, Ltd. v United States, 17 C.I.T. 18 (1993). [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 12:19 pm
According to the Plaintiff, it is a violation of the 14th amendment of the United States Constitution:[T]he defendants have irrationally and intentionally treated the plaintiff differently from others identically situated to the plaintiff, in violation of the plaintiff’s right to equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution as enforced through Sections 1983 and 1988 of Title 42 of… [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 12:55 pm
Like Columbus Day in the United States, Día de la Raza is a national holiday in many Latin American countries and in Spain. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:41 am
Nov. 1, 2004) (citing Wolfe v. [read post]
