Search for: "United States v. Washington" Results 5521 - 5540 of 8,905
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2010, 2:25 pm by Gideon Alper
For both cases, the United States District Court recently said that DOMA is unconstitutional. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 7:00 am by Eva Arevuo
  Related articles The Calls Grow Louder For Obama To Ignore Congress, And Raise The Debt Ceiling Unilaterally (businessinsider.com) United States Constitution (archives.gov) Perry V. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The Supreme Court has now heard oral arguments in two gerrymandering cases this term, and the world wonders whether Justice Anthony Kennedy will at last carry through on his suggestion in 2004’s Vieth v. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 9:12 am
Among the amici urging the Court simply to overrule Flast v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Nothing in this Act shall apply to any of the following:(1) Actions or transactions specifically authorized by laws administered by any regulatory body or officer acting under statutory authority of this State or the United States.815 Ill. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 11:18 am
Let's just say the documentation around CTA's receipt of AutoCAD seemed murky. 9th Circuit cases: As far as applicable Ninth Circuit precedent, the court found an answer favorable to Vernor in United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2024, 1:25 am by INFORRM
United States On 2 December 2024, judgment was handed down dismissing the appeal in State of Washington v Meta Platforms, Inc., — P.3d —, 2024 WL 4929812 (Wash. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 12:11 am
The Colorado Appelate Court, reviewing all of the circumstances involving email correspondence, affirmed the validity of the email as a "written denial".A Washington case, Lake v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 12:23 pm by Lyle Denniston
” The decision relied in significant part upon the Supreme Court’s 1974 decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 4:08 pm
(Inventive Step) (Patently-O) CAFC reverses W D Washington on rare interference ruling: Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v Cardiac Science Operating Company (Washington State Patent Law Blog) CAFC: Design patents – symmetry requires elimination of points-of-novelty test for anticipation: International Seaway Trading Corp. v Walgreens Corporation (Patently-O) (IP Osgoode) CAFC: Means plus function claim element does not cover ‘spectrum of… [read post]