Search for: "University System v. State"
Results 5521 - 5540
of 8,144
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2008, 2:54 pm
Board of Regents of the University of Houston, No. 05-0661. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 3:10 pm
In EEOC v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 5:34 am
Sometime before commencement of the Supreme Court’s 2009 term, Mike Sacks, a third-year law student at Georgetown University, had an idea. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:14 am
In Brown v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:48 am
No’ had been broadcast in Member States that affords special protection to film titles: Danjaq v OHIM, Mission Products (Class 46) Jesper Kongstad, Benoît Battistelli enter the fray in battle to be next EPO President (IAM) EPO sets deadline for presidential applications (Managing Intellectual Property) (IAM) The IP ecosystem (Innovationpartners) More work on draft council regulation on the EU community patent (BLOG@IP::JUR) Mr Bruno van Pottelsberghe calling for… [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 3:59 am
Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 7:06 am
The United States Supreme Court is already considering a related issue, the extent of immunity for prosecutors who fabricate evidence, in Pottawattamie County v. [read post]
8 Aug 2015, 4:27 am
The defendants pointed out that the device was capable of a variety of non-infrigning uses (an argument that had been also made in the famous US case of Sony v Universal). [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 10:49 am
Laurence Steinberg, a developmental psychologist at Temple University in Philadelphia, is one of the leading experts in the United States on adolescent behavior and adolescent brain biology. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 11:51 am
Twitter, Inc. and Maleksaeedi v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court in Kokesh v. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 8:58 am
Regents of University of California (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376, 393, citations and internal quotations omitted.) [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 1:31 pm
However, this grey area—and direction for state and federal legislatures to act—left the door open for (and openly invited) changes to the current system. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 5:01 am
The plaintiffs in the case, Paepcke v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 6:04 am
Pastuszenski, Goodwin Procter LLP, on Tuesday, July 18, 2017 Tags: California, Class actions, Jurisdiction, New York, PSLRA, Securities Act, Securities litigation, Shareholder suits, SLUSA, State law, Supreme Court CalPERS v. [read post]
18 Nov 2012, 10:44 pm
Contraceptive Exemption Injunction: The United States District Court for the District of Columbia granted a preliminary injunction against the application of the contraceptives mandate in HHS regulations in Tyndale House Publishers, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:53 am
It was also settled before the case could be heard by a jury at the state level. [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:55 am
For instance in Tremblay et al. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am
Non-provider-owned CII leverages a third party’s computer systems instead of its own and will be subject to specified requirements under the new law. [read post]
5 May 2011, 8:26 am
Related PostsApril 21, 2011 -- Universal Periodic Review and Reception of Asylum Seekers (0)April 5, 2011 -- A, B & C v Ireland: Update (0) [read post]
