Search for: "Washington v. Downes" Results 5521 - 5540 of 5,957
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2008, 8:03 am
– Brdo: (IPR-Helpdesk), 9-12 June: (US) Strategies for management of IP – Chicago: (IPR-Helpdesk), 16 June / 1 July:US PLI: ‘Prior art & obviousness 2008: The PTO and CAFC perspective on patent law sections 102 & 103’ - San Francisco / New York: (Patent Docs), 17-20 June: US BIO international convention – San Diego: (Patent Docs), 18-20 June / 9-11 July: US PLI: ‘Fundamentals of patent prosecution 2008: A… [read post]
14 May 2008, 9:00 pm
 I have lived in two celebrity towns: Manhattan and Washington, D.C. [read post]
13 May 2008, 7:40 am
Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond was wrong when it determined that Virginia courts acted reasonably in turning down his claims. [read post]
5 May 2008, 9:24 pm
…”Given the arguments made in its motion for reconsideration (which the court denied), plaintiff undoubtedly disputes these allegations, though it does not address the fees issue in its trial brief.The case cite is The Christensen Firm v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 2:36 pm
The ruling struck down laws banning racially mixed marriages in at least 17 states.They had married in Washington in 1958, when she was 18. [read post]
5 May 2008, 7:06 am
You can read the Supreme Court opinion in Loving v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 10:17 am
Griswold, which struck down the law allowing the federal government to print money. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), Domain name transfer made easier: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), Quantum of obviousness in Australian patent laws - C Lawson: (IP Down Under), Separating Sony sheep from Grokster (and Kazaa) goats: Reckoning [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 12:41 pm
Virginia Board of Elections, the 1966 decision that struck down a $1.50 nondiscriminatory poll tax. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 6:40 am
The following analysis was written by Richard Samp, Chief Counsel of the Washington Legal Foundation in Washington, DC. [read post]