Search for: "AT&T Operations Inc"
Results 5541 - 5560
of 10,923
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2014, 11:10 am
An S&P Analyst, Dhaval Shah, noted that “[t]he rating reflects our view of the project's contractual structure, which appropriately allocates risk between the project and FDOT, and our assessment of the project's risks in completing construction on time and within budget, and in operating the project over the long-term concession. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 7:14 am
An S&P Analyst, Dhaval Shah, noted that “[t]he rating reflects our view of the project’s contractual structure, which appropriately allocates risk between the project and FDOT, and our assessment of the project’s risks in completing construction on time and within budget, and in operating the project over the long-term concession. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 4:30 am
Pfizer, Inc., 2014 U.S. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 9:25 am
The case is Sandhill Amusements, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:07 am
Similarly, Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 10:02 pm
The defendants, who ran an operation known as Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals Inc., continued to deceptively market weight-loss products in violation of a 2008 federal court order, with unsubstantiated claims such as “rapid fat loss,” “fat burner,” “thermogenic” and “curbs the appetite. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 11:53 am
Medtronic Inc., 2014 U.S. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 8:12 am
Operating through a few different corporate entities such as N2G Distributing, Inc. and Alpha Performance Labs, Diehl sold energy shots by the names of 6 Hour Energy Shot, Nitro2Go Instant Energy, and Extreme Monster** Energy Shot. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 3:14 am
Caterpillar Inc. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 3:02 pm
In buySAFE, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 6:36 am
The opt-in plaintiffs in Lagos were from 15 different sales offices, operating under 28 regional sales managers and 12 sales directors, the court stated, noting that the issue before the Lagos court was whether RAMs and GAMs from across the country were similarly situated. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 4:52 am
They don’t enforce other laws (e.g. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 1:18 pm
The case is Chanel Inc. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 10:46 am
Citigroup Global Mkts., Inc. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 3:19 am
One of the critical determining factors for the SEC was whether: [T]he costs or other consequences associated with one or more known incidents or the risk of potential incidents represent a material event, trend, or uncertainty that is reasonably likely to have a material effect on the registrant’s results of operations, liquidity, or financial condition or would cause reported financial information not to be necessarily indicative of future operating results… [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
Playtime Theatres, Inc. and its progeny, an hours-of-operation regulation targeting negative secondary effects must be supported by highly specific, statistically significant empirical evidence. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 6:30 am
©2014 Amaxx Risk Solutions, Inc. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 4:14 am
The Delaware Supreme Court stirred up quite a bit of controversy earlier this year in the ATP Tours, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Lee, decided Daniel T. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 11:30 am
Smith & Nephew, Inc., 2104 U.S. [read post]
