Search for: "Ames v. Ames" Results 5541 - 5560 of 29,151
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm by Ronald Collins
Question: The epigraph to your book is taken from Ralph Ellison’s “Invisible Man” (1952), a novel that explored the social and intellectual issues facing African Americans in the early 20th century: “I am invisible, understand, simply because people refuse to see me … When they approach me they see only my surroundings, themselves, or figments of their imagination – indeed, everything and anything except me. [read post]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------In Mount Lemmon Fire District v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
I am not just sitting at my desk, waiting for the sky to fall. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 8:57 am by chief
This is probably of great importance, and almost certainly more significant than the write-up that I am giving it suggests. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 9:33 am by Richard Hunt
Of course I am defense counsel, so my interests are clear. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 3:22 pm by Giles Peaker
The ‘consideration of the CFA’ point – I am mystified. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 3:34 am by Ben
Under US-wide federal copyright law AM/FM radio stations aren't obliged to pay any royalties to artists and labels for the recordings they play, but satellite and online stations are. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 3:05 am
., Serial No. 87622839 [Section 2(d) refusal of MERIDIAN for pet food in view of the registered mark MERIDIAN ANIMAL HEALTH & Design for, inter alia, "nutritional and dietary supplements for animals, namely, nutritional supplements for pets to prevent or treat dry skin, hot spots, sores, rashes, worms and other parasites, joint pain, and arthritis”].November 19, 2019 - 11 AM: The Travelers Indemnity Company v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 2:11 am by Dave
In Guiste v Lambeth LBC (2019) EWCA Civ 1758, the Court of Appeal returned again to the meaning of Lord Neuberger’s eliptical phrase in Hotak v Southwark LBC that, for the purposes of the homelessness provisions in the Housing Act 1996, vulnerability meant being significantly more vulnerable than ordinarily vulnerable as a result of being made homeless. [read post]