Search for: "BARRETT"
Results 5541 - 5560
of 6,529
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2021, 11:53 am
Take, for example, Benny Johnson, Ruth Shalit Barrett and David Richards to name three. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 10:07 am
In a concurring opinion, Justice Brett Kavanaugh (joined by Justice Amy Coney Barrett) agreed with Justice Thomas that Article II issues are raised by the False Claims Act’s qui tam provisions and that the Court should consider them in an appropriate case down the road. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 3:38 pm
” Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote his own 13-page concurring opinion, joined by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, in which he focused on how the court should deal with emergency applications in cases – like this one – involving efforts to block enforcement of a new state or federal law. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 6:48 am
Writing for the 8-0 court (Justice Amy Coney Barrett took no part in the case, as it was argued in October before she joined the bench), Alito started with the text. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 7:18 pm
Barrett, 494 U.S. 638, 649 (1990) (emphasis added). [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:58 pm
He was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 4:43 pm
” Justice Barrett, writing for the majority, agreed with the parties that Van Buren was entitled to obtain the information he had accessed and was authorized to retrieve information about the license plate number. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 5:09 am
Granted, control of the docket is a prize won by the right wing when the Senate affirmed Justice Amy Coney Barrett to take a supermarjority of the Nine. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 3:46 pm
Justice Amy Coney Barrett also was skeptical. [read post]
16 May 2024, 5:54 am
Kurek continued – later supported by Conservative MP Michael Barrett – and made the Conservative strategy on Bill S-210 clear: filibuster the actual study of the bill and claim opponents are siding with pornography sites. [read post]
5 May 2022, 12:41 pm
A harder and purer opinion might not get the signatures of Justices Barrett, Kavanaugh, or Gorsuch. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 2:51 pm
Barrett, both decided in 1987). [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 10:36 am
Justice Gorsuch, joined by Justices Justices Thomas and Barrett, concluded that the states’ alleged injuries met general redressability standards, but could not be redressed in this particular instance because of a statute that prohibits most federal courts from issuing certain immigration-related injunctions. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 12:46 pm
Justice Barrett focused her skepticism there, noting in particular that the Appropriations Clause may just mean that Congress gets to designate a funding structure and does not restrict the mechanics of what Congress can write a funding bill to say. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 4:22 am
Justices Breyer, Roberts, Sotomayor, and Kagan figured out this obvious attempt to circumvent the Constitution, but Justices Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett claimed not to. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
The upcoming presidential election was too close for any nominee to be fairly considered.That was followed by the hypocrisy of McConnell’s ramming through the confirmation of Justice Amy Coney Barrett one week before the 2020 election.But for those two exercises of naked power, all three of the decisions described here would have gone the other way, with Chief Justice Roberts in the majority every time.In Louisiana v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 7:56 pm
Justice Kagan wrote the majority opinion, joined by the Chief Justice and Justices Thomas, Sotomayor, Barrett, and Jackson. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 9:35 am
But when pressed by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, Abitron agreed that Steele would have come out differently under the modern jurisprudence and that the cleanest way to resolve the current case would be to overrule it. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 6:23 am
Citing a series of California and federal cases (including Barrett v. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 6:03 pm
Many media accounts have focused on the fact that Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Barrett have adopted children, which may help explain their vote. [read post]
