Search for: "Best v. Best"
Results 5541 - 5560
of 41,835
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am
To quote one such case, [E]vidence submitted to the Court highlights the problems pseudonyms may pose at trial and the confusion it will undoubtably produce, despite counsel's best efforts to adequately prepare their respective clients. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 1:46 am
The meaning of that provision is yet to be considered by the courts (Note: the Court of Session declined to opine on the matter in Keatings v Advocate General [2021] CSOH 16 on the basis that it was a hypothetical question in that case). [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 12:33 pm
The grant-funded California Restraint Safety Education and Training (CARSEAT) V campaign is aimed at improving child passenger safety throughout the state. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 10:08 am
Cir. 1995) (holding that even though Chu’s “application claims to be a CIP of the Doyle patent,” some claims were not supported by Doyle alone, so for those claims “the Doyle patent was properly relied on as prior art”) Santarus, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 2:11 pm
(BOE) v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 1:49 pm
Nixon v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 12:48 pm
That is, one is looking at the Arizona rule independently of the question of how it fits with other states' rules.Bibb balancing - In Bibb v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 12:03 pm
See Plunkett v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 7:45 am
Its importance was further highlighted by the abortive case of New Hampshire v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 7:45 am
Its importance was further highlighted by the abortive case of New Hampshire v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 3:29 am
In English law, damages “are awarded with the object of putting the claimant – as an individual – in the same position, as best money can do it, as if the wrong had not occurred”, Lord Leggatt said. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 10:45 pm
Under the Epic v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 9:56 pm
However, in light of the Taittinger decision (Taittinger SA v ALLBEV LTD [1993] F.S.R. 641, which had arisen in the context of ‘extended’ passing off) and the ‘Basmati Bus’ decision, misrepresentation could arise even in the case of goods of a different nature, as a non-negligible part of the relevant public might believe that the goods referred to by the BoA (namely flour of rice, rice based snack food, rice pulp or rice meal for forage), when labelled as… [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 9:01 pm
Two years later, in McDonald v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 9:01 pm
Two years later, in McDonald v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 8:00 pm
v=UODUzow514MVideo Credit: Sean Evans, @evvo1991backtothemovies.com/ [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 10:17 am
Porsche A.G. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 2:00 am
Sansone v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 2:00 am
Sansone v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:25 pm
Doe v. [read post]
