Search for: "Birth v. Birth"
Results 5541 - 5560
of 7,193
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2011, 10:51 am
I also can't help but wonder what reaction both groups ought to have to a case like Palmore v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 3:35 am
This was later confirmed by the Court in City of Indianapolis v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 4:59 am
(Kluwer Patent Blog) USPTO statement at WIPO side event on Medicines Patent Pool (Knowledge Ecology International) US: To implement health reform orphan drug exclusion, HRSA issues first-ever proposed regulation on 340B drug discount program (FDA Law Blog) US: FDA officials hint at provisions of biosimilar guidances (Patent Docs) US: Huffington Post: Data Exclusivity: Getting the balance right (PatentlyBIOtech) US: Report gauges economic impact of Human Genome Project (Patent Docs) US: Chairman… [read post]
23 May 2011, 1:28 pm
Matter of Corrigan v Orosco 2011 NY Slip Op 04048 Decided on May 10, 2011 Appellate Division, Second Department In a custody proceeding, the family court, sua sponte, ordered a child protective investigation of the subject children to be performed by the Department of Social Services. [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:58 am
The Illinois Appellate Court clarified definitions of "next of kin" according to the Illinois Wrongful Death Act in its ruling on Judith Baez, etc. v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:15 am
In Khalip v Khalip, 2011 WL 1882514 (E.D.Mich.) [read post]
22 May 2011, 2:36 pm
Connecticut and Roe v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 9:17 pm
Pratten v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 2:34 pm
Resource: Tamayo v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 11:35 am
However, an additional hack allows someone to reset a user password if they know the corresponding email address and birth date associated with the account, both of which were compromised in the initial attack. [read post]
20 May 2011, 6:07 am
V. [read post]
19 May 2011, 4:33 am
” ) [10] Laurentide Motels Ltd. v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 4:08 pm
Federal courts follow the Daubert standard (from the case Daubert v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 12:13 pm
Lawyers and non-lawyers may or may not recognize the case of Snyder v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 12:33 am
Sun Pharmaceuticals on question of obviousness-type double patenting (Patent Docs) (IPBiz) Glumetza (Metformin) – US: Depomed receives notice of Para IV certification against patents from second ANDA filer, Sun Pharmaceutical (GenericsWeb) Myfortic7 (Mycophenolate) – US: Novartis files patent infringement complaint against Teva in response to Para IV certification filing (Patent Docs) NuvaRing (Etonogestrel, Estradiol) – US: ALJ Luckern sets procedural schedule in Certain Vaginal… [read post]
17 May 2011, 9:28 am
For example, in Cohen v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:09 am
Is it time to use Article V to amend Article V? [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm
In this regard, Para 3.4 (v) of the said Manual reads as follows:"(v) In cases of alleged sex offences such as intercourse with a female child, forcible rape, indecent liberties or perversion, it is important that the victim, as well as the accused, be made available for interview and polygraph examination. [read post]
16 May 2011, 3:14 am
See Szabo v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 7:49 am
Hall v. [read post]
