Search for: "California v. Law" Results 5541 - 5560 of 33,829
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2024, 9:04 am by Eric Goldman
Grindr Online Dating Services Must Give California Users a “Cooling Off” Period–Howell v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 10:32 am by Eric Goldman
On the other hand, other decisions from federal district courts in California have found that plaintiffs must do no more than plead the elements of a section 1595 claim, including in a case where a Jane Doe plaintiff sued the same defendants that Plaintiffs sue here—those entities that own and operate Pornhub—on very similar grounds. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 7:19 am by Eric Goldman
“Atkinson’s California Unfair Competition Law claim would target the same publishing conduct as his implied warranty claim—the removal of his posts—it is also barred by Section 230(c)(1). [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 2:13 pm by Walter Olson
County of San Diego, in which a Ninth Circuit panel struck down a licensing scheme under California law in which even persons with legitimate self-defense concerns were unable to get permission to carry handguns outside the home. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 3:00 pm
California State University, Chico (1979) 88 Cal.App.3d 985 (Bonn) and Kistler v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 2:09 pm
By Dan Forman On April 22, 2010, the California Supreme Court granted review of Harris v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 5:47 pm
  See whether trial courts (and other panels in the Court of Appeal) agree with the most recent case -- Justice Premo's -- and agree that the prior case is old, bad law. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 6:31 am by Kali Borkoski
California, followed by United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 5:00 am
One of the earlier California cases allowing an attorney-at-law to be present at an Independent Medical Exam (IME) called by the defense was Shariff v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 3:46 pm
The WSJ.com Law Blog posts today about possible remedies for the problem of recusal of Supreme Court Justices due to stock ownership in one of the parties, noting that Chief Justice Robert’s recent recusal from a case resulted in a “problematic even-numbered panel” that rendered a 4-4 decision in Warner-Lambert Co., LLC v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 10:18 pm by Gordon Firemark
Show notes are located at http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/63 Here’s what we talked about… Cariou v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 9:36 pm by John W. Arden
He received a B.A. in Economics at the University of California, San Diego and a J.D. and a Ph.D. in Economics from the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), where he was Managing Editor of the UCLA Law Review. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 7:06 am by William A. Ruskin
The Bloomberg BNA Toxics Law Reporter reported this morning concerning an important new decision from the Supreme Court of California in O'Neil v. [read post]